The population seems to have embraced regular toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste to a large extent. However, regarding techniques for using fluoride toothpaste effectively, there was great potential for improvement, especially among the older respondents.

Prevention of approximal caries by FVT may result in cost containment, at a benefit cost ratio of 1.8: 1, given that the program can be administered at school.

The OHPs described toothbrushing with F toothpaste as very important, although the plaque removal perspective dominated. They did not focus on how to use F toothpaste, because they believed that knowledge about and appropriate behaviour concerning F toothpaste were already familiar to their patients.

Since 2008, FRAMM has been a guideline for caries prevention for all 3- to 15-year-olds in the Västra Götaland Region in Sweden and a predominant part is school-based fluoride varnish applications for all 12- to 15-year-olds. The aims were to evaluate dental health-economic data among 12- to 15-year-olds, based on the approximal caries prevalence at the age of 12, and to evaluate cost-effectiveness. Caries data for 13,490 adolescents born in 1993 who did not take part and 11,321 adolescents born in 1998 who followed this guideline were extracted from dental records. Those with no dentin and/or enamel caries lesions and/or fillings on the approximal surfaces were pooled into the “low” subgroup, those with 1–3 into the “moderate” subgroup and those with ≥4 into the “high” subgroup. The results revealed that the low subgroup had a low approximal caries increment compared with the moderate and high subgroups during the 4-year study period. In all groups, there were statistically significant differences between those who took part in the guideline and those who did not. The analysis of cost-effectiveness revealed the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the high subgroup for decayed and/or filled approximal surfaces (DFSa) and approximal enamel lesions together and the highest ICER for the low subgroup for DFSa alone. To conclude, the FRAMM Guideline reduced the caries increment for adolescents with low, moderate and high approximal caries prevalence. The subgroup with the most favourable cost-effectiveness comprised those with a high caries prevalence at the age of 12.

The aim was to evaluate, in a 3-year RCT study, school-based fluoride varnish programme on approximal caries incidence and approximal caries progression in 13- to 16-year-olds in high, medium and low caries risk areas on the Swedish west coast. Seven hundred and fifty-eight (89%) fulfilled the trial. Using a simple mobile unit, 2 dental nurses treated the adolescents with F varnish: (1) twice a year at 6-month intervals, (2) 3 times a year within 1 week, (3) 8 times per year during the semesters with 1-month intervals, and (4) no treatment (control). Radiographic caries recording was performed blindly by one of the authors. Concerning total approximal caries incidence, control groups in all areas developed more caries than F varnish groups, with the largest difference in the high risk area: 3.05 ± 3.37 new approximal caries lesions (mean ± SD) compared to 0.54 ± 1.26 for group 3, 0.95 ± 1.67 for group 1 and 1.40 ± 1.89 for group 2 (p < 0.001). More than 90% of the new approximal lesions in all the groups and in all areas consisted of new enamel lesions. Regarding progression of enamel lesions, there were only significant differences between groups 1–3 and group 4 in the high caries risk area. Prevented fraction for fluoride varnish treatment twice a year at 6-month intervals was 69% in high, 66% in medium and 20% in low risk areas. To conclude, school-based F varnish treatment every 6 months in 13- to 16-year-olds is excellent to prevent approximal caries in medium and high caries risk areas.