Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in carefully selected patients with cardiac or respiratory failure. However, complications are common and can be associated with worse outcomes, while data on risk factors and outcomes are inconsistent and sparse. Therefore, we sought to investigate potential risk factors and predictors of haemorrhage and adverse events during ECMO and its influence on mortality. We retrospectively reviewed all patients on ECMO support admitted to intensive care units of a tertiary university centre in Austria. In a period of ten years, ECMO support was used in 613 patients, with 321 patients meeting the inclusion criteria of this study. Haemorrhage, occurring in more than one third of the included patients (123, 38%), represented the most common and serious ECMO complication, being associated with an increased one year mortality (51% vs. 35%, p = 0.005). The main risk factors for haemorrhage were severity of the disease (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01, p = 0.047), a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (HR = 1.01, p = 0.007), and lower values of C-reactive protein (HR = 0.96, p = 0.005) and procalcitonin (HR = 0.99, p = 0.029). In summary, haemorrhage remained the main ECMO complication with increased mortality. Moreover, we reported a possible association of lower inflammation and bleeding during ECMO support for the first time. This generated a new hypothesis that warrants further research. Finally, we recommend stricter monitoring of anticoagulation especially in patients without hyperinflammation.

Background: The initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is associated with complex inflammatory and coagulatory processes, raising the need for systemic anticoagulation. The balance of anticoagulatory and procoagulant factors is essential, as therapeutic anticoagulation confers a further risk of potentially life-threatening bleeding. Therefore, our study aims to systematize and analyze the most recent evidence regarding anticoagulation monitoring and the thromboembolic events in patients receiving veno-arterial ECMO support. Methods: Using the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched the Scopus and PubMed databases up to October 2022. A weighted effects model was employed for the meta-analytic portion of the study. Results: Six studies comprising 1728 patients were included in the final analysis. Unfractionated heparin was used for anticoagulation, with an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) monitoring goal set between 45 and 80 s. The majority of studies aimed to investigate the incidence of adverse events and potential risk factors for thromboembolic and bleeding events. None of the authors found any association of aPTT levels with the occurrence of thromboembolic events. Finally, the most frequent adverse events were hemorrhage (pooled 43%, 95% CI 28.4; 59.5) and any kind of thrombosis (pooled 36%, 95% CI 21.7; 53.7), and more than one-half of patients did not survive to discharge (pooled 54%). Conclusions: Despite the tremendous development of critical care, aPTT-guided systemic anticoagulation is still the standard monitoring tool. We did not find any association of aPTT levels with thrombosis. Further evidence and new trials should clarify the true incidence of thromboembolic events, along with the best anticoagulation and monitoring strategy in veno-arterial ECMO patients.

BackgroundSurgical implantation rates of bioprosthetic valves, especially the use of sutureless or rapid deployment valves, as well as the advent of transcatheter valve implantation (TAVR) have increased during the last decades mainly due to their excellent haemodynamic and clinical results. One common characteristic of all bioprosthetic types of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and TAVR is the risk of early degeneration, which leads to valve-dysfunction and is associated with higher rates of valve reinterventions. Recent studies have demonstrated that cusp thrombosis may play a role in early valve dysfunction. This case report is, to our knowledge, the first documentation on a successful treatment of early aortic valve (AV) degeneration of a sutureless AV thrombosis with a valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR implantation. Case summaryA 77 years old woman was re-evaluated from the heart-team, which considered the following characteristics: severe impairment of mobility and frailty with an STS-score of 10.01% and a EuroSCORE II of 6.9%. Due to the high surgical risk for SAVR, we decided to perform a ViV-TAVR using a balloonexpandable bioprosthesis. The procedure was performed via transfemoral access under general anaesthesia using a 23 mm Edwards-Sapien 3 bioprosthesis without balloon-valvuloplasty and with nominal-volume dilation under rapid-pacing. DiscussionThe differentiation of bioprosthesis valve thrombosis, and hypoattenuating leaflet thickening vs. structural valve degeneration can be difficult, and a multimodality imaging approach, comprising trans-thoracic echocardiogram, transoesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography, useful. These investigations are very important to decide the right strategy of surgical valve replacement vs. TAVR.

Objectives Left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is considered an independent risk factor for clinical events after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We have conducted a subgroup analysis of the multicentre European DuraGraft registry to investigate clinical event-rates at 1-year in patients with and without LMCAD undergoing isolated CABG in contemporary practice. Methods Patients undergoing isolated CABG were selected. The primary end-point was the incidence of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or repeat revascularization (RR) at 1-year. The secondary end-point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) defined as MACE plus stroke. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance for differences in baseline characteristics. Results LMCAD was present in 1,033 (41.2%) and absent in 1,477 (58.8%) patients. At 1-year, the MACE rate was higher for LMCAD patients (8.2% vs 5.1%, p = 0.002) driven by higher rates of death (5.4% vs 3.4%, p = 0.016), MI (3.0% vs 1.3%, p = 0.002) and numerically higher rates of RR (2.8% vs 1.8%, p = 0.13). The incidence of MACCE was 8.8% vs 6.6%, p = 0.043 with a stroke rate of 1.0% and 2.4%, p = 0.011, for LMCAD and non-LMCAD group, respectively. After PSM, the MACE rate was 8.0% vs 5.2%, p = 0.015. The incidence of death was 5.1% vs 3.7%, p = 0.10, MI 3.0% vs 1.4%, p = 0.020, and RR was 2.7% vs 1.6%, p = 0.090, for the LMCAD and non-LMCAD group, respectively. Less strokes occurred in LMCAD patients (1.0% vs 2.4%, p = 0.017). The MACCE rate was not different: 8.5% vs 6.7%, p = 0.12. Conclusions In this large registry, LMCAD was demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for MACE after isolated CABG. Conversely, the risk of stroke was lower in LMCAD patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02922088.