The number of content such as photos, videos and articles shared by internet users on internet has increased with the popularization of social media platforms, which started to be channeled into our lives, especially in 21st century. Users had opportunity to share their content more easily in these platforms. Interaction features of these platforms such as liking, sharing, commenting have enabled content to become widespread in social media. Although, this situation has positive effects, it also has negative effects. The scandal known as Facebook-Cambridge Analytica Scandal is one of recent examples of these negative reflections. In this study, the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica Scandal is examined within the participatory culture, digital labor exploitation and invasion of privacy. In this study, it is aimed to examine freedom and reliability offered to users by Social media with existing concepts. In order to better explain the scandal, which puts the reliability of social media into question for users, it will be to talk about two main actors of the case: Facebook and Cambridge Analytica. The scandal will be explained in detail. Literature review is used as a method. A general literature review on the subject was made and the method will also be explained. Scandal will be examined within the framework of relevant concepts such as Participatory Culture, digital labor exploitation and violation of privacy. Even though it is said that social media offers free and safe environment to users, the result is that this environment hasn’t been provided within the particular of scandal and shows the necessity of questioning the trust in social media.

Aim: The aim of the study is to examine the time management skills of nursing students during the Covid-19 pandemic period. Method: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted between May and October 2021 with the participation of 317 nursing students. In the study, "Descriptive Information Form" and "Time Management Inventory" were used as data collection tools. Google forms survey was used to collect the data. Results: The mean age of the students was 20.49±1.45. 246 (77.6%) of the students were women and 108 (34.1%) were second year students. The mean scores of the students on the Time Management Inventory were 84.68±14.65. The Time Wasters sub-dimension scores of female students were statistically significantly higher than male students (t=2,427; p=.016). The students with the highest Time Wasters sub-dimension scores were first-year students (t=13.87±2.85; p=.002). Being in the same city as the university he/she is enrolled in (t=4,078; p