Background: The range-of motion (ROM) is an essential component of joint mobility. Shoulder ROM measurement has been problematic due to its complexity. A marker less motion capture system can be a potential alternative for upper limb assessment. Currently, there is no systematic review to evaluate the validity of a marker less motion capture system for assessing shoulder ROM. This study aims to describe methods to evaluate the reliability and validity of a single camera marker less motion capture system that uses an RGB-depth sensor to measure shoulder ROM. Methods: Studies that measured shoulder ROM with a single camera marker less motion capture system using the RGB-depth sensor and assessed the intra- and/or inter-rater reliability, and/or validity of the device will be included. The search of electronic databases, such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochran library, Cumulative Index to Nursing, and Allied Health Literature via EBSCO, IEEE Xplore, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, KoreaMed, Korean studies Information Service System, and Research Information Sharing Services will be performed for all relevant articles from inception to December 2022. Two authors will independently perform quality assessments using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments checklist for reliability, measurement error of outcome measurement instrument, and criterion validity. The primary outcomes will be the intra- and inter-rater reliability and validity of the markerless motion capture system measuring shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, or external rotation. A subgroup analysis would be performed if there are sufficient data to pool to identify an influencing factor in the measurement of ROM using a marker less motion capture system. Results and Conclusion: These findings will present tools to utilize and evaluate single camera motion capture systems for the medical use for clinicians and healthcare experts and can aid in further clinical research using such a system for different movements and other joints.

Background: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common complication of shingling. Herbal medicine for PHN is clinically used to improve chronic pain and other symptoms that reduce the quality of life (QoL), such as sleep disturbances and emotional problems. This study aims to describe methods for synthesizing evidence for the effectiveness and safety of herbal medicine for treating PHN. Methods: Randomized controlled trials using herbal medicine in patients with PHN will be included in this review. Electronic databases such as MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, KoreaMed, Research Information Service System, Korean Studies Information Service System, Database Periodical Information Academic, Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System, and Korea Citation Index will be searched without language limitations from their inception to September 2022. Two authors will perform quality assessments independently using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome will be pain intensity, and the secondary outcomes will be global impression, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, QoL, and safety. All data from eligible studies will be synthesized for meta-analysis. Results: This study will be a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oral herbal medicine for treatment of PHN. Conclusion: This study will provide evidence for herbal medicine as a potential treatment for PHN which is advantageous not only for patients but also for researchers and policymakers.