Acetylcholine (ACh) neurotransmitter of the cholinergic system in the brain is involved in learning, memory, stress responses, and cognitive functioning. It is hydrolyzed into choline and acetic acid by two key cholinesterase enzymes, viz., acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE). A loss or degeneration of cholinergic neurons that leads to a reduction in ACh levels is considered a significant contributing factor in the development of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Numerous studies have shown that cholinesterase inhibitors can raise the level of ACh and, therefore, enhance people’s quality of life, and, at the very least, it can temporarily lessen the symptoms of NDs. 1,2,3-triazole, a five-membered heterocyclic ring, is a privileged moiety, that is, a central scaffold, and is capable of interacting with a variety of receptors and enzymes to exhibit a broad range of important biological activities. Recently, it has been clubbed with other pharmacophoric fragments/molecules in hope of obtaining potent and selective AChE and/or BuChE inhibitors. The present updated review succinctly summarizes the different synthetic strategies used to synthesize the 1,2,3-triazole moiety. It also highlights the anticholinesterase potential of various 1,2,3-triazole di/trihybrids reported in the past seven years (2015-2022), including a rationale for hybridization and with an emphasis on their structural features for the development and optimization of cholinesterase inhibitors to treat NDs.

No abstract

Background: Cancer-induced mortality is increasingly prevalent globally which skyrocketed the necessity to discover new/novel safe and effective anticancer drugs. Cancer is characterized by the continuous multiplication of cells in the human which is unable to control. Scientific research is drawing its attention towards naturally-derived bioactive compounds as they have fewer side effects compared to the current synthetic drugs used for chemotherapy. Objective: Drugs isolated from natural sources and their role in the manipulation of epigenetic markers in cancer are discussed briefly in this review article. Methods: With advancing medicinal plant biotechnology and microbiology in the past century, several anticancer phytomedicines were developed. Modern pharmacopeia contains at least 25% herbal-based remedy including clinically used anticancer drugs. These drugs mainly include the podophyllotoxin derivatives vinca alkaloids, curcumin, mistletoe plant extracts, taxanes, camptothecin, combretastatin, and others including colchicine, artesunate, homoharringtonine, ellipticine, roscovitine, maytanasin, tapsigargin,andbruceantin. Results: Compounds (psammaplin, didemnin, dolastin, ecteinascidin,and halichondrin) isolated from marine sources and animals such as microalgae, cyanobacteria, heterotrophic bacteria, invertebrates. They have been evaluated for their anticancer activity on cells and experimental animal models and used chemotherapy.Drug induced manipulation of epigenetic markers plays an important role in the treatment of cancer. Conclusion: The development of a new drug from isolated bioactive compounds of plant sources has been a feasible way to lower the toxicity and increase their effectiveness against cancer. Potential anticancer therapeutic leads obtained from various ethnomedicinal plants, foods, marine, and microorganisms are showing effective yet realistically safe pharmacological activity. This review will highlight important plant-based bioactive compounds like curcumin, stilbenes, terpenes, other polyphenolic phyto-compounds, and structurally related families that are used to prevent/ ameliorate cancer. However, a contribution from all possible fields of science is still a prerequisite for discovering safe and effective anticancer drugs.

Background: Xanthones, natural or synthetic, due to their wide range of biological activities, have become an interesting subject of investigation for many researchers. Xanthonic scaffold has proven to have a vital role in anticancer drug development since many of its derivatives have shown anticancer activities on various cell lines. In addition, targeting epigenetic markers in cancer has yielded promising results. There have also been reports on the impact of xanthone and related polyphenolic compounds on epigenetics markers in cancer prevention and therapy. Objective: The objective of this review is to comprehensively highlight the main natural and non-natural sources of xanthones having potential anti-cancer effects along with their key structural elements, structure-activity relationships (SARs), mechanisms of action, and epigenetic profile of xanthone-based anti-cancer compounds. The challenges and future directions of xanthone-based therapies are also discussed briefly. Method: The methods involved in the preparation of the present review included the collection of all recent information up to November 2021 from various scientific databases, indexed periodicals, and search engines such as Medline Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, PubMed Central, Web of Science, and Science Direct. Results: Exploration of the diversity of the xanthone scaffold led to the identification of several derivatives having prominent anti-cancer activity. Their unique structural diversity and synthetic modifications showed the ongoing endeavour of enriching the chemical diversity of the xanthone molecular framework to discover pharmacologically interesting compounds. However, studies regarding their modes of action, pharmacokinetic properties, clinical data, epigenetics, and safety are limited. Conclusion: Elucidation of the exact biological mechanisms and the associated targets of xanthones will yield better opportunities for these compounds to be developed as potential anticancer drugs. Further clinical studies with conclusive results are required to implement xanthones as treatment modalities in cancer.

Breast cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in women worldwide. Early diagnosis and an appropriate therapeutic approach for all cancers are climacterics for a favorable prognosis. Targeting the immune system in breast cancer is already a clinical reality with notable successes, specifically with checkpoint blockade antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. However, there have been inevitable setbacks in the clinical application of cancer immunotherapy, including inadequate immune responses due to insufficient delivery of immunostimulants to immune cells and uncontrolled immune system modulation. Rapid advancements and new evidence have suggested that nanomedicine-based immunotherapy may be a viable option for treating breast cancer.