No abstract

Introduction: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a complex surgery with high risk for massive bleeding and blood component transfusion. This retrospective study investigated the effect of adopting ROTEM based transfusion algorithm on blood products transfusion practice among LDLT recipients and the effect of this change on patient outcome. Material and methods: Data of 216 patients with predicted intraoperative massive bleeding (blood loss ≥70 ml blood/kg, or blood loss > 150 ml/min with hemodynamic affection with continuing need for transfusion) were collected from our database. Patients were divided into two groups according to transfusion protocol applied; Pre-ROTEM group (n = 95), ROTEM group (n = 121). Basal characteristics, blood component transfusion, graft outcome and patient outcome (28-day mortality and one-year mortality) were compared between the two groups. Results: Transfused packed red blood cells (PRBCs) units, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) units, and application of massive transfusion protocol (MTP) were significantly lower in the ROTEM group compared to pre-ROTEM group [8(7) vs 4.5(5), p < 0.01, 12.5(4) vs 5.6(3), p < 0.001, 29% vs 20%, p < 0.005 respectively]. The survival distributions for the two studied groups showed no statistically significant difference, p < 0.46. Conclusions: ROTEM based transfusion algorithms applied in LDLT decreased blood component transfusion and enhanced early graft function.

No abstract

Background:Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion may pose a special problem in patients under general anesthesia with first attempt failure rates up to 50%. To increase insertion success rate and decreases related complications, several techniques have been developed. In this study, digital assistance technique is compared to the classic insertion technique in neck flexion.Materials and Methods:In this prospective randomized study, 160 patients were randomly allocated into two groups; control group (Group C, n = 80) where NGT tube will be inserted with the neck in flexion position and digital facilitation group (Group D, n = 80).Results:Overall success rate and first attempt success were statistically higher in Group D compared to Group C (94% vs. 81%, P = 0.02, 80% vs. 62%, P = 0.01 respectively) with significantly lower insertion time in Group D (13 ± 5 s. vs. 10 ± 3 s., P = 0.00).Conclusions:Digital assistance of NGT insertion in the anesthetized or unconscious patient is an effective, fast, and safe method that can be either used as a routine technique or as a rescue in case of failed other methods.

Background: Reduction of anesthesia cost has become a necessity, especially in developing countries. Recently, automated control of end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (EtSev) has been proposed as a new technique with both cost-effectiveness and safety profiles. In this study, sevoflurane consumption (primary outcome variable) was evaluated during living donor hepatectomy using automated control of EtSev (EtC) at fresh gas flow (FGF) of 0.5 and 2 L/min compared to manual control (MC) technique at FGF of 2 L/min. Materials and methods: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial including 60 Potential donors scheduled for living donor right hepatectomy. patients were randomized into 3 equal groups (according to target control of sevoflurane), MC group, EtC-2L group, and EtC-0.5L group. In MC group: FGF was set to 2 L/ min, inspired concentration of Sevoflurane (FiSev) was set to 1.5-2% in 0.4 fractional inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2), while in EtC-2L group: FGF was set to 2 L/min, EtSev was set to 1-1.5% with end tidal oxygen concentration (EtO2) target of 0.35. In EtC-0.5L group, FGF was set to minimal flow and EtSev target to 1-1.5% and EtO2 target of 0.35. Anesthetic gases consumption (sevoflurane ml, Oxygen L, and air consumption L) per anesthesia hour were recorded at the end of surgery. Other recorded data included intraoperative hemodynamics, the number of user adjustments, and extubation time. Results: Significant reduction in sevoflurane consumption when EtC-0.5L is used (4.2 ± 1.3 ml/h, 12.6 ± 2.6 ml/h, and 15 ± 2.9 ml/h respectively, p. 0.001). Also, a significant decrease in overall numbers of user adjustments between the three groups (8 times for EtC-0.5L group, 7 times in EtC-2L group, 22 times for MC group, p. 0.008) was observed. Conclusion: automated control of EtSev during anesthesia of living donor hepatectomy significantly lowers sevoflurane consumption and decreases required user interventions without deleterious effect on patient safety.