The environmental and economic impacts
of implementing a circular
economy in plastic waste supply chains are not well understood. The
proposed systems analysis framework assesses environmental, social,
and economic impacts of plastic waste supply chains in a circular
economy. The first objective of this article is to identify data sets,
models, and knowledge gaps associated with waste plastic supply chain
processes, mainly in the U.S. Our literature review indicated that
the best data sets exist for virgin plastic resin production, mechanical
recycling, landfilling, and incineration, with the materials recovery
facility being intermediate, and with chemical recycling the lowest.
The second objective of this perspective is to develop an illustrative
application of the framework by conducting a preliminary systems analysis
of PET bottles with closed-loop recycling. The preliminary systems
analysis of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles utilized a linear
programming optimization method. Our optimization model indicated
that both chemical and mechanical recycling processes are needed to
achieve a true circular economy of PET bottles with the least greenhouse
gas emissions, specifically reductions of 24% when compared with the
linear economy. Good quality and standardized life cycle assessment
and techno-economic analysis studies are needed to better understand
the environmental, economic, and social impacts of advanced sorting
and chemical recycling technologies.
Plastics are useful and beneficial materials that contribute
to
an improved quality of life, yet they generate significant solid wastes
and emissions and consume significant energy resources. Systems analysis
is incomplete on current linear production systems of plastics supply
chains and their associated processes. Our study combines material
flow and life cycle assessment data sets of polyethylene terephthalate
(PET) and the main polyolefin polymers in the United States, comprising
over 70% of plastics flows. This study estimates the total greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumption of these supply chains,
including transportation and end-of-life processes, lacking in prior
studies. We calculate annual GHG emissions and energy consumption
of these plastic supply chains to be 101 MMT CO2-eq and
3248 PJ in 2019, respectively. The GHG emissions of these supply chains
represented 1.5% of the total U.S. emissions and 5% of the total U.S.
industry-related GHG emissions. The total energy consumption of these
supply chains represented 3.1% of the total U.S. energy consumption
in 2019. Transportation of PET and polyolefin plastic materials contributes
5% and 2% to the total supply chain GHG emissions and energy consumption,
respectively. This baseline study provides a benchmark and enables
a comparison to future circular production systems for plastics in
the United States.
Enzyme accessibility
plays an important role in controlling the
rate of conversion of cellulose to glucose in biomass. The goal of
this study is to measure the cellulose accessibility due to the effect
of dilute acid pretreatment (DAP) and enzymatic hydrolysis (EH) time
of Populus biomass. The NMR cryoporometry technique was applied to
measure pore size distribution and pore volume over a wide range of
pore sizes (range from 0 to 10 000 Å) for both pretreated
and enzymatically hydrolyzed biomass substrates. The results showed
a clear shift in the pore size ranges (from smaller to larger) as
the DAP (acid concentration 0.5% wt and temperature 160 °C) and
EH time increased. In most cases, the pore volume increased with the
time of treatment, which clearly suggests internal pore expansion.
A linear correlation is observed between the initial rate of enzymatic
hydrolysis of pretreated poplar and absolute pore volume greater than
the critical pore size (51 Å) and shows the effect of residual
enzyme activity on the surface of wood chips.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.