Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) comprises a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders, it share common symptom - of progressive lower spastic paraparesis. The most common autosomal dominant (AD) forms of HSP are SPG4 (SPAST gene) and SPG3 (ATL1 gene). In the current research we investigated for the first time the distribution of pathogenic mutations in SPAST and ATL1 genes within a large cohort of Russian HSP patients (122 probands; 69 famillial cases). We determined the frequencies of genetic abnormalities using Sanger sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of targeted gene panels. As a result, SPG4 was diagnosed in 30.3% (37/122) of HSP cases, where the familial cases represented 37.7% (26/69) of SPG4. In total 31 pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were detected in SPAST, with 14 new mutations. Among all detected SPAST variants, 29% were gross deletions and duplications. The proportion of SPG3 variants in Russian cohort was 8.2% (10/122) that were all familial cases. All 10 detected ATL1 mutations were missense substitutions, most of which were in the mutational hot spots of 4, 7, 8, 12 exons, with 2 novel mutations. This work will be helpful for the populational genetics of HSP understanding.

No abstract

Background: Spastic paraplegia type 30 (SPG30) caused by KIF1A mutations was first reported in 2011 and was initially considered a very rare autosomal recessive (AR) form. In the last years, thanks to the development of massive parallel sequencing, SPG30 proved to be a rather common autosomal dominant (AD) form of familial or sporadic spastic paraplegia (SPG),, with a wide range of phenotypes: pure and complicated. The aim of our study is to detect AD SPG30 cases and to examine their molecular and clinical characteristics for the first time in the Russian population. Methods: Clinical, genealogical and molecular methods were used. Molecular methods included massive parallel sequencing (MPS) of custom panel 'spastic paraplegias' with 62 target genes complemented by familial Sanger sequencing. One case was detected by the whole-exome sequencing. Results: AD SPG30 was detected in 10 unrelated families, making it the 3rd (8.4%) most common SPG form in the cohort of 118 families. No AR SPG30 cases were detected. In total, 9 heterozygous KIF1A mutations were detected, with 4 novel and 5 known mutations. All the mutations were located within KIF1A motor domain. Six cases had pure phenotypes, of which 5 were familial, where 2 familial cases demonstrated incomplete penetrance, early onset and slow relatively benign SPG course. All 4 complicated cases were caused by novel mutations without familial history. The phenotypes varied from severe in two patients (e.g. lack of walking, pronounced mental retardation) to relatively mild non-disabling symptoms in two others. Conclusion: AD SPG30 is one of the most common forms of SPG in Russia, the disorder has pronounced clinical variability while pure familial cases represent a significant part.

No abstract

No abstract