Background: Polytrauma is understood as significant injuries, occurring at the same time, to two or more anatomical regions (the ISS regions) or organ systems, with at least one of the injuries considered as posing a threat to life. Trauma is the main cause of unexpected demise in individuals below the age of 44 years and represents a huge burden on society. Vascular injury is highly morbid; it can lead to rapid exsanguination and death, posing a threat to both life and the limb. Independent predictors of outcome include mechanism of injury, associated injuries, and time from injury to definitive care. The mechanisms of vascular injury in the setting of polytrauma are either blunt, penetrating or a combination of the two. Methods: Comprehensive literature review of current diagnostic approaches to traumatic vascular injury in the context of polytrauma. The factors influencing the diagnostic approach are highlighted. The focus is the epidemiology of vascular injury and diagnostic approaches to it in the context of polytrauma. Results: Traumatic vascular injuries are associated with limb loss or even death. They are characterised by multiple injuries, the dilemma of the diagnostic approach, timing of intervention and higher risk of limb loss or death. The systematic approach in terms of clinical diagnosis and imaging is crucial in order save life and preserve the limb. The various diagnostic tools to individualise the investigation are discussed. Conclusion: This paper highlights the significance of timely and appropriate use of diagnostic tools for traumatic vascular trauma to save life and to preserve the limb. The associated injury also plays a crucial role in deciding the imaging modalities. At times, more than one investigation may be required.
Background: Resource constraints have resulted in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) being deferred where possible. However, delayed investigation is costly and leads to disease progression. This study audits the UGE done at a single institution. It was motivated by the observation that public hospitals often experience an acute shortage of endoscopes, which are prone to frequent breaks and service delivery is further compromised by an increased workload. Methods: This was a retrospective observational descriptive study of patients aged 20 to 45 years who had undergone gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) at Prince Mshiyeni Memorial Hospital (PMMH) in KwaZulu-Natal, during the period January 2015 to December 2015. One hundred and ninety-four patients' charts and UGE reports were reviewed. Data were analysed using SPSS Statistics version 24. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or medians (interquartile range IQR) as appropriate. Mean ± standard deviation was compared using the Student's t-test. Proportions and categorical variables were compared using the Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. An ethical approval was obtained from the University of KwaZulu-Natal BREC (BE 447/17) and the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Health Ethics Committee. Results: Epigastric pain was found to be the most common indication for UGE, with a total of 112 (57.7%) out of total of 194 patients, followed by upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) (42) (21.6%). Amongst patients presenting with epigastric pain, only 12(10.7%) patients could be confirmed that they had received acid suppression therapy prior to the testing. In the age group 20-25 years, there was a highest number of patients presenting with corrosive substance ingestion, 11 (25.0%). The commonest finding was gastritis in 99 patients (51.0%), followed by normal findings in 50 (25.7%) patients. Conclusions: Epigastric pain was the most common indication and gastritis was the predominant finding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.