Purpose of Review This review of the literature aims to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown on teenagers’ mental health. We distinguish two groups: adolescents who had already been diagnosed with a mental disorder and the general population of adolescents. Recent Findings An increase in the number of mental health-related difficulties in adolescents has already been reported in previous health crises. Accordingly, the perceived well-being of teenagers declined during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adolescents with mental disorders were significantly more affected by the lockdown than those in the general population. Summary The effect of the COVID-19 crisis on the mental health of adolescents has been heterogeneous. The first pandemic wave was essentially associated with an increase of internalizing symptoms in adolescents, particularly anxiety, depression and eating disorders. The impact on externalizing symptoms was less clear, and seem to concern mostly adolescents with pre-existing behavioral disorders. During the second and later waves of the pandemic, an upsurge of suicidal ideation and attempts among adolescents have been reported in many countries.

Objective: This study describes patterns of distress associated with exposure to potentially morally injurious experiences (PMIEs) in a Canadian military sample.Method: Thematic analysis was performed on interviews from PMIE-exposed military members and Veterans. Participants also completed structured diagnostic interviews, and measures of trauma exposure and psychopathology.Multiple regression examined associations among these variables. Information on pharmacological treatment and past diagnoses are reported.Results: Eight qualitative themes were identified: changes in moral attitudes, increased sensitivity and reactivity to moral situations, loss of trust, disruptions in identity, disruptions in spirituality, disruptions in interpersonal relatedness, rumination, and internalizing and externalizing emotions and behaviors. Self-report data revealed that degree of PMIE exposure was meaningfully associated with posttraumatic stress disorder. Conclusion:Qualitative but not quantitative findings supported existing models of moral injury (MI).

Thirty-six patients with panic disorder (PD) and 35 patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) participated in an open alprazolam treatment phase that preceded controlled withdrawal from alprazolam. Clinical ratings, blood pressure and heart rate were obtained along with plasma measurements of cortisol, ACTH, growth hormone and catecholamines. A similar clinical response profile was evident in both groups with rapid onset of improvement within the first week. The two diagnostic groups differed in their biological response to alprazolam. PD patients had a significant reduction in blood pressure, plasma cortisol and a trend toward significant reduction in plasma epinephrine, which were not seen in the GAD patients. GAD patients showed a significant reduction in plasma norepinephrine. These findings provide further evidence that PD and GAD are biologically distinct syndromes.

No abstract

A population at risk for higher prevalence of anxiety disorders can be identified among patients seen in an emergency service. Physicians in primary care settings and general emergency services should consider anxiety disorders in the differential diagnosis of patients with somatic complaints but without a diagnosis of physical disorder.