This article offers a detailed review of the current approaches to anticancer
therapy that target the death receptors of malignant cells. Here, we provide a
comprehensive overview of the structure and function of death receptors and
their ligands, describe the current and latest trends in the development of
death receptor agonists, and perform their comparative analysis. In addition,
we discuss the DR4 and DR5 agonistic antibodies that are being evaluated at
various stages of clinical trials. Finally, we conclude by stating that death
receptor agonists may be improved through increasing their stability,
solubility, and elimination half-life, as well as by overcoming the resistance
of tumor cells. What’s more, effective application of these antibodies
requires a more detailed study of their use in combination with other
anticancer agents.
Organophosphate toxins (OPs) are the most toxic low-molecular compounds. The
extremely potent toxicity of OPs is determined by their specificity toward the
nerve system. Human butyrylcholinesterase (hBChE) is a natural bioscavenger
against a broad spectrum of OPs, which makes it a promising candidate for the
development of DNA-encoded bioscavengers. The high values of the protective
index observed for recombinant hBChE (rhBChE) make it appropriate for therapy
against OP poisoning, especially in the case of highly toxic warfare nerve
agents. Nevertheless, large-scale application of biopharmaceuticals based on
hBChE is restricted due to its high cost and extremely rapid elimination from
the bloodstream. In the present study, we examine two approaches for
long-acting rhBChE production: I) chemical polysialylation and II)
in-vivo tetramerization. We demonstrate that both approaches
significantly improve the pharmacokinetic characteristics of rhBChE (more than
5 and 10 times, respectively), which makes it possible to use rhBChE conjugated
with polysialic acids (rhBChE-CAO) and tetrameric rhBChE (4rhBChE) in the
treatment of OP poisonings.
Differential diagnosis of bacterial and viral meningitis is an urgent problem of the modern clinical medicine. Early and accurate detection of meningitis etiology largely determines the strategy of its treatment and significantly increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome for the patient. In the present work, we analyzed the peptidome and cytokine profiles of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 17 patients with meningitis of bacterial and viral etiology and of 20 neurologically healthy controls. In addition to the identified peptides (potential biomarkers), we found significant differences in the cytokine status of the CSF of the patients. We found that cut-off of 100 pg/ml of IL-1β, TNF, and GM-CSF levels discriminates bacterial and viral meningitis with 100% specificity and selectivity. We demonstrated for the first time the reduction in the level of two cytokines, IL-13 and GM-CSF, in the CSF of patients with viral meningitis in comparison with the controls. The decrease in GM-CSF level in the CSF of patients with viral meningitis can be explained by a disproportionate increase in the levels of cytokines IL-10, IFN-γ, and IL-4, which inhibit the GM-CSF expression, whereas IL-1, IL-6, and TNF activate it. These observations suggest an additional approach for differential diagnosis of bacterial and viral meningitis based on the normalized ratio IL-10/IL-1β and IL-10/TNF > 1, as well as on the ratio IFN-γ/IL-1β and IFN-γ/TNF < 0.1. Our findings extend the panel of promising clinical and diagnostic biomarkers of viral and bacterial meningitis and reveal opposite changes in the cytokine expression in meningitis due to compensatory action of pro- and antiinflammatory factors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.