R,,, 6 V', then R~, ee (VAF°). Indeed, ifR~; 6 VAF0 ° and e(R~;) = R~;NF = R~,, then A0 C R,g, A0 C R~;, A~ C_ R,g, and m (R~,)[A0] C m(R,~), but rn0 .... ,rnn E m (R~,) and, consequently, 1 = ~ rnial 6 m(R.,L), i<_n an impossibility. The proof is complete. REFERENCES 1. Yu. L. Ershov, "Boolean families of valuation rings," Algebra Logika, 31, No. 3, 274-294 (1992).2. P. Roquette, "Principal ideal theorem for holomorphy rings in fields," J. Reine Ang. Math., 262/263, 361-374 (1973).
Translated by O. Bessonova
MINIMAL PERMUTATION REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE SIMPLE CLASSICAL GROUPS. SPECIAL LINEAR, SYMPLECTIC, AND UNITARY GROUPS V. D. MazurovUDC 519.44A faithful permutation representation of least degree for a group G is called a minimal permutation representation of G. A classical group is a general linear, or symplectic, or unitary, or orthogonal group over a field; a simple classical group is one isomorphic to the (unique) nonabehan composition factor of some classical group.Minimal permutation representations of finite sporadic simple groups have been much studied to date: their degrees and subdegrees are calculated, stabilizers of one and two points are found (see the summary table in [1]). The goal of this paper is to add to this study by treating finite simple classical groups.The degrees of minimal permutation representations of finite classical groups were found by Cooperstein in [2]. Some of the degrees listed therein are, however, not minimal, with inaccuracies arising from the violation of some of the inequalities for small fields or dimensions. Fortunately, the errors were readily amenable to corrections, and a revised list of minimal degrees appeared in [3, p. 175]. Unfortunately, neither is this list free of errors, namely, for groups U2,,,(2), where m is not divisible by 3, and for Pf~+,,(3) = O+,n(3), m > 4, the minimal degrees are indicated incorrectly.