Although the decoding rules have been largely elucidated, the physical-chemical reasons for the "correctness" of codon:anticodon duplexes have never been clear. In this work, on the basis of the available data, we propose that the correct codon:anticodon duplexes are those whose formation and interaction with the ribosomal decoding center are not accompanied by uncompensated losses of hydrogen and ionic bonds. Other factors such as proofreading, base-base stacking and aminoacyl-tRNA concentration contribute to the efficiency and accuracy of aminoacyl-tRNA selection, and certainly these factors are important; but we suggest that analyses of hydrogen and ionic bonding alone provides a robust first-order approximation of decoding accuracy. Thus our model can simplify predictions about decoding accuracy and error. The model can be refined with data, but is already powerful enough to explain all of the available data on decoding accuracy. Here we predict which duplexes should be considered correct, which duplexes are responsible for virtually all misreading, and we suggest an evolutionary scheme that gave rise to the mixed boxes of the genetic code.
IT is generally accepted that the action of a protein cannot be understood until its three-dimensional structure is known. At present, X-ray analysis of protein crystals is the only method of obtaining such structural information. It is to be feared, however, that many important proteins will never give suitable crystals so that one is obliged to consider other approaches to structure elucidation. Renaturation experiments indicated1–4 that the three-dimensional structure of many if not all proteins is a unique function of their amino acid sequence. Therefore, in principle one should be able to determine these structures by using only the information contained in the sequence. A first step in this direction is the prediction of secondary structures (α helices, β pleated sheets, β bends) in globular proteins from amino acid sequences. Several prediction schemes have been devised to this end5–23. It is the aim of this paper to demonstrate directly the current standing of such methods
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.