To evaluate antibody to hepatitis E virus (anti-HEV) seroreactivity, 5000 US blood donors were tested for anti-HEV by two EIAs: a mosaic protein assay (MPr-EIA) and a recombinant protein assay (RPr-EIA). Overall, 59 (1.2%) were seroreactive by MPr-EIA and 70 (1.4%) were seroreactive by RPr-EIA. The overall concordance between tests was 98.5% (4925/5000); the concordance among reactive sera by either test was only 27% (27/102). In a case-control study, seroreactive persons were more likely than seronegative persons to have traveled to countries in which HEV is endemic (odds ratio [OR] for MPr-EIA = 4.3, P < .001; OR for RPr-EIA = 2.5, P = .005), but 31% of MPr-EIA anti-HEV-reactive persons and 38% of RPr-EIA anti-HEV-reactive persons had no history of international travel. These findings suggest that travelers to regions in which HEV is endemic can acquire subclinical HEV infection. The significance of anti-HEV seroreactivity among persons without an international travel history needs to be determined.

The hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA levels were measured in 281 serum samples from 32 untreated volunteer blood donors prospectively collected over a period of 14-73 months. The HCV-RNA levels were tested by the branched DNA signal amplification assay. The mean HCV-RNA levels of each donor ranged from 4.92 log10-6.36 log10 gene equivalents/mL (25%, median, 75% percentile; 5.51, 5.79, 6.12 log10 gene equivalents/mL). The fluctuations of HCV-RNA levels in individuals, represented by the ratio of the maximum value divided by the minimum value, ranged from a 1.7- to a 141-fold change. Fluctuations with more than a 10-fold change were observed in five subjects: 11-, 15-, 17-, 96- and 141-fold changes. Eleven subjects were followed for at least 5 years; all subjects had fluctuations of HCV-RNA levels greater than 3-fold during the observation period. No blood donor was observed whose HCV levels changed from a high-level phase to a low-level phase or from low to high. No subjects cleared HCV during follow-up, although two had undetectable HCV-RNA levels transiently. These findings reveal that changes in HCV-RNA levels occur which are unrelated to treatment with interferon and ribavirin.

When hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV) enzyme immunoassay (EIA1) testing became available in 1990, we tested samples from previously transfused blood units, traced the recipients of reactive units, and evaluated the recipients for HCV infection during the 12 months after transfusion. Ten of 42 recipients of EIA1-reactive blood were anti-HCV reactive on follow-up by EIA1 and 12 were reactive by a second- generation assay (EIA2). Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detected HCV RNA in 5 seronegative recipients. In all, 17 of 42 recipients (40%) of EIA1-reactive blood had evidence of HCV infection. In comparison, 54 surgery patients, who received either no transfusion or autologous EIA1-nonreactive blood, remained EIA1 nonreactive and RT-PCR negative for 1 year; 1 patient (1.8%) became EIA2 reactive (P < or = .01). Of the recipients of anti-HVC reactive blood transfusions (reactive by both EIA1 and a supplemental 4-antigen strip immunoblot assay [RIBA2]), 14 (93%) of the recipients had evidence of HCV infection compared with only 3 of 27 recipients (11%) of EIA1-reactive, RIBA2-nonreactive blood (P < or = .01). Thus, blood components reactive for anti-HCV EIA1 may have transmitted HCV up to 40% of the time, but blood components found reactive by both EIA1 and RIBA2 may transmit HCV with a frequency of greater than 90%.

The aim of this study was to determine if using hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) enzyme immunoassay version 2.0 (EIA2) in addition to version 1.0 (EIA1) increased the safety of the blood supply. Blood non-reactive by anti-HCV EIA1 was transfused in 1990-92. Stored samples from 40098 units, donated prior to 13 March 1992 were later tested by EIA2. For donor units reactive for anti-HCV by EIA2, a recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA2) was also carried out. In 63 cases, recipients of transfusions which were EIA2 negative or EIA2 reactive were tested for anti-HCV and elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels 9-12 months after transfusion; pretransfusion anti-HCV status of recipients was unknown. Among these multitransfused patients receiving units that were negative by both EIA1 and EIA2, 1/26 (4%) had anti-HCV. Among transfusion recipients of units negative by EIA1, but who received at least one unit reactive by EIA2, 4/37 recipients (11%) were anti-HCV reactive (P = 0.59). For the recipients of EIA2 reactive blood, when the donor unit was RIBA2 non-reactive, 0/23 recipients were reactive by anti-HCV. Among the recipients of a RIBA2 indeterminate unit, 1/10 recipients had anti-HCV, but for patients who received at least one RIBA2 reactive unit, 3/4 recipients had anti-HCV (P = 0.03). Hence, second-generation anti-HCV testing detected additional units capable of transmitting hepatitis C that were not detected by first-generation testing. However, RIBA2 is a more specific method than EIA2 for determining units capable of transmitting HCV.

When hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV) enzyme immunoassay (EIA1) testing became available in 1990, we tested samples from previously transfused blood units, traced the recipients of reactive units, and evaluated the recipients for HCV infection during the 12 months after transfusion. Ten of 42 recipients of EIA1-reactive blood were anti-HCV reactive on follow-up by EIA1 and 12 were reactive by a second- generation assay (EIA2). Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detected HCV RNA in 5 seronegative recipients. In all, 17 of 42 recipients (40%) of EIA1-reactive blood had evidence of HCV infection. In comparison, 54 surgery patients, who received either no transfusion or autologous EIA1-nonreactive blood, remained EIA1 nonreactive and RT-PCR negative for 1 year; 1 patient (1.8%) became EIA2 reactive (P < or = .01). Of the recipients of anti-HVC reactive blood transfusions (reactive by both EIA1 and a supplemental 4-antigen strip immunoblot assay [RIBA2]), 14 (93%) of the recipients had evidence of HCV infection compared with only 3 of 27 recipients (11%) of EIA1-reactive, RIBA2-nonreactive blood (P < or = .01). Thus, blood components reactive for anti-HCV EIA1 may have transmitted HCV up to 40% of the time, but blood components found reactive by both EIA1 and RIBA2 may transmit HCV with a frequency of greater than 90%.