No abstract

No abstract

It is shown that up to the present time, an effective, operating, efficient model of reactive power flow and power quality control has not been created in Russia. It is necessary to sharpen attention to the problem. It is necessary to analyze the state of the problem. To try to find out the reasons. Give suggestions. Involve specialists in its discussion. The main reason for the lack of a workable model is legal barriers to its implementation in practice. The criterion for legitimacy of application of incentive tariffs in the form of discounts (surcharges) may be equality of income of the energy supplying organization from application of economically justified tariff and income from application of incentive tariff. Known proposals in the form of mathematical expressions for calculation of discounts (surcharges) to the tariff require changes to existing regulatory and legal documents, which are not related to the methods of calculation of surcharges (discounts). What complicates the process of their implementation. The proposed model of formation of the incentive tariff with the use of a single approach to calculation of discounts (surcharges) both in case of power quality and in case of consumption of reactive power, does not require changes in the documents not related to the methods of calculation of discounts (surcharges) and differs in compliance with the criterion of legitimacy of their application.

No abstract

The article noted that feed-in tariffs are effective enough to attract consumers to participate in the process of improving power quality and reactive power compensation. It is shown that the application of premiums and discounts must not modify the revenues of the budget of ESO. Otherwise there is a contradiction to the principles of state regulation of tariffs for services of natural monopolies. In this case, legal barriers do not allow to use the model in practice. The proposed criteria that must be considered in the development and approval of the scale of discounts and allowances to ensure the legal purity of the incentive rate, to avoid its cancellation, as it was in 2000. Then, the proposed mechanism of discounts and allowances with the support of the Antimonopoly service and the Ministry of justice of the Russian Federation was cancelled as violating the principles of state regulation of tariffs in the conditions of the natural monopoly position of the network organization.