The subject. The article defines the modern content of the following concept: administrative procedure, administrative jurisdiction.The purpose of the study is to identify the correlation between the concepts of administrative procedure and administrative jurisdiction.The methodology includes methods of complex analysis and synthesis of the Russian legislation and scientific sources, as well as formal-logical and formal-legal methods.The main results and scope of application. The administrative process and administrative procedures are not regulated properly nowadays. The results of scientific research indicate a discrepancy in the interpretation of the concept of “administrative process”. An administrative process consists of management and administrative jurisdiction (proceedings).Process and production correlate as general and special phenomena.The administrative process, which manifests itself specifically in various types of administrative proceedings, is a set of consistently performed procedural actions, which are performed at certain stages during the consideration of individual specific cases by the competent authorities.Administrative jurisdiction in the broad sense may be understood as totality of the powers of state or municipal bodies, established by the law or other normative legal acts, to regulate social relations, to assess the legality of actions of a person, to resolve legal disputes and to consider cases on administrative offences, to carry out other legally significant actions.Conclusions. Administrative jurisdictional activity (public, regulatory, regulative, enforcement), is connected with the solution of legal disputes. It is based on the law and is clearly regulated by it, it is carried out by special bodies, it’s result is the regulation of public relations and imposing administrative responsibility to the offenders.

The subject. The article considers the legal basis for the execution of decisions on administrative penalties in the form of disqualification from driving, as well as the prospects for the development of new legislation in the field of road traffic. The article examines the social relations that develop in the process of implementing the jurisdictional powers of the Russian State Traffic Inspectorate in ensuring road safety, preventing and suppressing offenses related to encroachment on motor vehicles, transported goods, the life and health of drivers and pedestrians.The purpose of the article is to confirm or disprove hypothesis that there are defects in Russian legislative regulation that prevent the effective execution of decisions on the disqualification from driving. They are not eliminated in the draft of the new Russian Code of Administrative Offences.The methodology of research is the provisions of the general theory of law, the modern science of administrative law and the theory of public administration. The authors used a systematic approach and formal legal analysis. The legislation of the Russian Federation and the practice of its enforcement were studied also.The main results. In accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 2 of the Russian Federal Law "On the Police", the execution of administrative penalties is one of the main activities of the police. The effectiveness of the entire proceedings in cases of administrative offenses largely depends on the execution of the adopted resolutions. The leading role in the execution of decisions on administrative penalties, in particular, related to the disqualification from driving, belongs to the internal affairs bodies. It is important to note that the execution of administrative penalties in practice is associated with certain difficulties.Conclusions. The execution of decisions on the imposition of disqualification from driving as an administrative penalty causes difficulties due to defects in legislative regulation, which are not fully resolved in the draft of the new Russian Code of Administrative Offences.

The subject. A comprehensive study of Russian legislation in the field of biological safety indicates the need to update and systematize the legal framework for protecting the health of citizens and ensuring the sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population as an important part of the mechanism of legal regulation of the national security of the Russian Federation. The purpose of the article is to confirm or refute hypothesis that there is a possibility and necessity of systematization and codification of public health legislation.The methodology. The authors analyze the practice of applying international law acts regulating the prevention of the spread of dangerous infectious diseases, the conclusions and recommendations of the WHO, the UN and other international organizations, as well as Russian public health legislation.The main results, scope of application. The current problems of Russian public health legislation are investigated, problems, prospects and main directions for its improvement are considered. The issues of theory and practice of legal regulation of public administration in conditions of emergency situations of a biological nature, topical aspects of strategic planning in the field of ensuring the epidemiological safety of regions are studied. Based on the results of a study of the current state of public health legislation, the main directions for its improvement and prospects for further development are substantiated, the position of the authors on the systematization and possible codification of sectoral legislation is presented. Conclusions. Codification of public health legislation is necessary, taking into account the new goals and objectives of the strategy for ensuring biological safety, the experience of applying domestic and international health regulations in a pandemic. This type of systematization of legal norms seems to be the most appropriate for improving the efficiency of the system for ensuring the sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population of the Russian Federation.