Abstract. Cache affinity between a process and a processor is observed when the processor cache has accumulated some amount of the process state, i.e., data or instructions. Cache affinity is exploited by OS schedulers: they tend to reschedule processes to run on a recently used processor. On conventional (unicore) multiprocessor systems, exploitation of cache affinity improves performance. It is not yet known, however, whether similar performance improvements would be observed on multicore processors. Understanding these effects is crucial for design of efficient multicore scheduling algorithms. Our study analyzes performance effects of cache affinity exploitation on multicore processors. We find that performance improvements on multicore uniprocessors are not significant. At the same time, performance improvements on multicore multiprocessors are rather pronounced.

Asymmetric multicore processors (AMP) consist of cores exposing the same instruction-set architecture (ISA) but varying in size, frequency, power consumption and performance. AMPs were shown to be more power efficient than conventional symmetric multicore processors, and it is therefore likely that future multicore systems will include cores of different types. AMPs derive their efficiency from core specialization: instruction streams can be assigned to run on the cores best suited to their demands for architectural resources. System efficiency is improved as a result. To perform effective matching of threads to cores, the thread scheduler must be asymmetry-aware; and while asymmetry-aware schedulers for operating systems are a well studied topic, asymmetry-awareness in hypervisors has not been addressed. A hypervisor must be asymmetry-aware to enable proper functioning of asymmetry-aware guest operating systems; otherwise they will be ineffective in virtual environments. Furthermore, a hypervisor must ensure that asymmetric cores are shared among multiple guests in a fair fashion or in accordance with their priorities. This work for the first time implements simple changes to the hypervisor scheduler, required to make it asymmetry-aware, and evaluates the benefits and overheads of these asymmetry-aware mechanisms. Our evaluation was performed using an open source hypervisor Xen on a real multicore system where asymmetry was emulated via CPU frequency scaling. We compared the asymmetry-aware hypervisor to default Xen. Our results indicate that asymmetry support can be implemented with low overheads, and resulting performance improvements can be significant, reaching up to 36% in our experiments. Most performance improvements are derived from the fact that an asymmetry-aware hypervisor ensures that the fast cores do not go idle before slow cores and from the fact that it maps virtual cores to physical cores for asymmetry-aware guests according to the guest's expectations. Other benefits from asymmetry awareness are fairer sharing of computing resources among VMs and more stable execution times.

Asymmetric multicore processors (AMP) consist of cores exposing the same instruction-set architecture (ISA) but varying in size, frequency, power consumption and performance. AMPs were shown to be more power efficient than conventional symmetric multicore processors, and it is therefore likely that future multicore systems will include cores of different types. AMPs derive their efficiency from core specialization: instruction streams can be assigned to run on the cores best suited to their demands for architectural resources. System efficiency is improved as a result. To perform effective matching of threads to cores, the thread scheduler must be asymmetry-aware; and while asymmetry-aware schedulers for operating systems are a well studied topic, asymmetry-awareness in hypervisors has not been addressed. A hypervisor must be asymmetry-aware to enable proper functioning of asymmetryaware guest operating systems; otherwise they will be ineffective in virtual environments. Furthermore, a hypervisor must ensure that asymmetric cores are shared among multiple guests in a fair fashion or in accordance with their priorities.This work for the first time implements simple changes to the hypervisor scheduler, required to make it asymmetry-aware, and evaluates the benefits and overheads of these asymmetryaware mechanisms. Our evaluation was performed using an open source hypervisor Xen on a real multicore system where asymmetry was emulated via CPU frequency scaling. We compared the asymmetry-aware hypervisor to default Xen. Our results indicate that asymmetry support can be implemented with low overheads, and resulting performance improvements can be significant, reaching up to 36% in our experiments. Most performance improvements are derived from the fact that an asymmetry-aware hypervisor ensures that the fast cores do not go idle before slow cores and from the fact that it maps virtual cores to physical cores for asymmetryaware guests according to the guest's expectations. Other benefits from asymmetry awareness are fairer sharing of computing resources among VMs and more stable execution times.

No abstract