No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Osseointegrated implants for transfemoral amputees facilitate direct load transfer between the prosthetic limb and femur; however, implant loosening is a common complication, and the associated implant-bone loads remain poorly understood. This case study aimed to use patient-specific computational modelling to evaluate bone-implant interface loading during standing and walking in a transfemoral amputee with an osseointegrated implant prior to prosthesis loosening and revision surgery.Methods: One male transfemoral amputee with an osseointegrated implant was recruited (age: 59-yrs, weight: 83kg) and computed tomography (CT) performed on the residual limb approximately 3 months prior to implant failure. Gait analyses were performed, and the CT images used to develop a finite element model of the patient's implant and surrounding bone. Simulations of static weight bearing, and over-ground walking were then performed.Findings: During standing, maximum and minimum principal strains in trabecular bone adjacent to the implant were 0.26% and -0.30%, respectively. Strains generated at the instant of contralateral toe-off and contralateral heel strike during walking were substantially higher and resulted in local trabecular bone yielding. Specifically, the maximum and minimum principal strains in the thin layer of trabecular bone surrounding the distal end of the implant were 1.15% and -0.98%, respectively.Interpretation: Localised yielding of trabecular bone at the interface between the femur and implant in transfemoral amputee osseointegrated prosthesis recipients may present a risk of implant loosening due to periprosthetic bone fracture during walking.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries most commonly occur after a perturbation. Prophylactic knee braces (PKBs) are off-the-shelf braces designed to prevent and reduce the severity of knee injuries during sports, yet their effectiveness has been debated. Purpose: To identify differences in ACL agonist and antagonist muscle forces, during braced and unbraced conditions, while walking with the application of unexpected perturbations. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 20 recreational athletes were perturbed during walking at a speed of 1.1 m/s, and motion analysis data were used to create patient-specific musculoskeletal models. Static optimization was performed to calculate the lower-limb muscle forces. Statistical parametric mapping was used to compare muscle forces between the braced and unbraced conditions during the stance phase of the perturbed cycle. Results: The brace reduced muscle forces in the quadriceps (QUADS), gastrocnemius (GAS), and soleus (SOL) but not in the hamstrings. The peak QUADS muscle force was significantly lower with the brace versus without at 49% to 60% of the stance phase (28.9 ± 12.98 vs 14.8 ± 5.06 N/kg, respectively; P < .001) and again at 99% of the stance phase (1.7 ± 0.4 vs 3.6 ± 0.13 N/kg, respectively; P = .049). The SOL muscle force peak was significantly lower with the brace versus without at 25% of the stance phase (1.9 ± 1.7 vs 4.6 ± 3.4 N/kg, respectively; P = .031) and at 39% of the stance phase (1.9 ± 1.4 vs 5.3 ± 5.6 N/kg, respectively; P = .007). In the GAS, there were no significant differences between conditions throughout the whole stance phase except between 97% and 100%, where the braced condition portrayed a smaller peak force (0.23 ± 0.13 vs 1.4 ± 1.1 N/kg for unbraced condition; P = .024). Conclusion: These findings suggested that PKBs that restrict knee hyperextension and knee valgus/varus motion can alter neuromuscular patterns, which result in a reduction of QUADS force. Clinical Relevance: Understanding the way PKBs alter muscle function and knee mechanics can provide invaluable information that will help in making decisions about their use. Further studies should investigate different types of braces and perturbations to evaluate the effectiveness of PKBs.