Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer’s disease and gender differences have been described on several aspects of PD. In the present commentary, we aimed to collect and discuss the currently available evidence on gender differences in PD regarding biomarkers, genetic factors, motor and non-motor symptoms, therapeutic management (including pharmacological and surgical treatment) as well as preclinical studies. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed by searching the Pubmed and Scopus databases with the search strings “biomarkers’’, ‘‘deep brain stimulation’’, “female”, ‘‘gender’’, ‘‘genetic”, ‘‘levodopa’’, ‘‘men’’, “male”, ‘‘motor symptoms’’, ‘‘non-motor symptoms’’, ‘‘Parkinson disease’’, ‘‘sex’’, ‘‘surgery’’, and ‘‘women’’. Results: The present review confirms the existence of differences between men and women in Parkinson Disease, pointing out new information regarding evidence from animal models, genetic factors, biomarkers, clinical features and pharmacological and surgical treatment. Conclusions: The overall goal is to acquire new informations about sex and gender differences in Parkinson Disease, in order to develop tailored intervetions.
Guillain-Barrè syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune-mediated neuropathy, possibly triggered by a recent infection or vaccination, and driven by an immune attack targeting the peripheral nervous system. GBS typically leads to ascending limb weakness, often with sensory and cranial nerve involvement 1–2 weeks after immune stimulation, but emergency and neurology physicians should be aware of its important clinical heterogeneity. In rare cases, bilateral facial nerve palsy can be the main clinical manifestation, as the case of the variant formerly known as bilateral facial weakness with paresthesias. An increasing number of case reports of GBS in patients receiving COVID-19 vaccination have been reported both during the pre-clinical phase and after large-scale authorities’ approval. We report two cases of bifacial palsy with paresthesias, a rare variant of GBS, both occurring after the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine Vaxzevria™ (formerly COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca), showing a favorable outcome after high-dose immunoglobulin therapy, and discuss the literature of GBS post-COVID-19 vaccination.
Introduction: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of orthostatic hypotension (OH) on cognitive functions in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) followed over time.Methods: Thirty-two MSA patients were enrolled and underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological battery; at baseline (T0) 15 out of 32 patients presented OH, assessed by means of orthostatic standing test. All patients underwent a follow-up (T1) evaluation 12 months after baseline. Thirteen out of 32 patients also underwent a second follow-up (T2) evaluation at 24 months. Changes over time on different neuropsychological tasks were compared between patients with and without OH by means of Mann-Whitney's U-test. Moreover, clinical categories of normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia were determined, and changes at T1 and T2 in global cognitive status were compared between patients with and without OH.Results: At T0, patients with OH had better performance on words/non-words repetition task (p = 0.02) compared to patients without OH. Compared to patients without OH, patients with OH performed worse on semantic association task (p < 0.01) at T1 and on Stroop test-error effect (p = 0.04) at T2. The percentage of patients with worsened cognitive status at T1 was higher among patients with OH than among patients without OH (93 vs. 59%, p = 0.03). OH (β = −4.67, p = 0.01), education (β = 0.45, p = 0.02), age (β = 0.19, p = 0.03), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment battery (MOCA) score at T0 (β = −0.26, p = 0.04) were significant predictors of global cognitive status worsening at T1.Discussion: We found that global cognitive status worsened at 1-year follow-up in 93% of patients with OH, and OH, along with age, education, and MOCA score, predicted cognitive worsening over time. To clarify the relationship between OH and cognitive dysfunction in MSA, we suggest the use of clinical categories of normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia in further longitudinal studies on MSA patients with and without OH.
Several MRI techniques have become available to support the early diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA), but few longitudinal studies on both MSA variants have been performed, and there are no established MRI markers of disease progression. We aimed to characterize longitudinal brain changes in 26 patients with MSA (14 MSA-P and 12 MSA-C) over a 1-year follow-up period in terms of local tissue density and T1w/T2w ratio in a-priori regions, namely, bilateral putamen, cerebellar gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and substantia nigra (SN). A significant GM density decrease was found in cerebellum and left putamen in the entire group (10.7 and 33.1% variation, respectively) and both MSA subtypes (MSA-C: 15.4 and 33.0% variation; MSA-P: 7.7 and 33.2%) and in right putamen in the entire group (19.8% variation) and patients with MSA-C (20.9% variation). A WM density decrease was found in the entire group (9.3% variation) and both subtypes in cerebellum-brainstem (MSA-C: 18.0% variation; MSA-P: 5% variation). The T1w/T2w ratio increase was found in the cerebellar and left putamen GM (6.6 and 24.9% variation), while a significant T1w/T2w ratio decrease was detected in SN in the entire MSA group (31% variation). We found a more progressive atrophy of the cerebellum in MSA-C with a similar progression of putaminal atrophy in the two variants. T1w/T2w ratio can be further studied as a potential marker of disease progression, possibly reflecting decreased neuronal density or iron accumulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.