Patients with angina pectoris, the cardinal symptom of myocardial ischaemia, yet without significant flow-limiting epicardial artery stenosis represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Coronary artery spasm (CAS) is an established cause for anginal chest pain in patients with angiographically unobstructed coronary arteries. CAS may occur at the epicardial level and/or in the microvasculature. Although the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of CAS are still largely unclear, endothelial dysfunction and vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) hyperreactivity seem to be involved as major players, although their contribution to induce CAS is still seen as controversial. This article will look at the role and possible mechanistic interplay between an impaired endothelial and VSMC function in the pathogenesis of CAS.

No abstract

Coronary vasomotion disorders represent a frequent cause of angina and/or dyspnoea in patients with non-obstructed coronary arteries. The highly sophisticated interplay of vasodilatation and vasoconstriction can be assessed in an interventional diagnostic procedure. Established parameters characterising adequate vasodilatation are coronary blood flow at rest, and, after drug-induced vasodilation, coronary flow reserve, and microvascular resistance (hyperaemic microvascular resistance, index of microcirculatory resistance). An increased vasoconstrictive potential is diagnosed by provocation testing with acetylcholine or ergonovine. This enables a diagnosis of coronary epicardial and/or microvascular spasm. Ischaemia associated with microvascular spasm can be confirmed by ischaemic ECG changes and the measurement of lactate concentrations in the coronary sinus. Although interventional diagnostic procedures are helpful for determining the mechanism of the angina, which may be the key to successful medical treatment, they are still neither widely accepted nor applied in many medical centres. This article summarises currently well-established invasive methods for the diagnosis of coronary functional disorders causing angina pectoris.

No abstract

Background: Coronary spasm is an established cause for myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries, and can be diagnosed using intracoronary acetylcholine testing. However, it has been questioned whether such testing is feasible and safe in the acute phase. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of coronary spasm and the safety of the acetylcholine test in patients with myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries compared to patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronaries. Methods: One hundred and eighty selected patients (52% women, mean age 62±13 years) with either myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries ( n=80) or stable angina and unobstructed coronaries ( n=100) were enrolled from 2007–2018. All patients underwent the acetylcholine test according to a standardised protocol immediately after diagnostic angiography. Apart from assessment of clinical, demographic and risk factor data, side effects and complications during the acetylcholine test were recorded. Results: Overall, epicardial spasm was found in 26% with a higher prevalence among the myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries compared to the stable angina patients (35% vs 19%, p=0.017). Microvascular spasm was found in 42% with a higher prevalence among the stable patients compared to the myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries cohort (53% vs 29%, p=0.0014). There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of side effects (16% vs 14%, p=0.674) or complications (1% vs 2.5%, p=0.438) between the two groups. None of the patients experienced irreversible complications. Conclusion: Coronary spasm is a frequent cause for myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries. Spasm provocation testing using acetylcholine is feasible in such patients in the acute phase. The complication rate during acetylcholine testing in myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries patients is low and comparable to patients with stable angina.