SummaryBackground Reticular erythematous mucinosis (REM) is an uncommon disease, the nosology and specific characteristics of which are controversial because most reports deal with single cases or small series. Objectives To describe the characteristics of patients with REM regarding demographics, clinical and pathological features, comorbidities, treatment and course. Methods A retrospective and prospective study was conducted on 25 patients diagnosed with REM in the setting of university-affiliated dermatology departments and dermatopathology centres. Results Of the 25 patients with REM, 16 were women (sex ratio 2 : 1) and the mean age was 46 years. The roles of sun exposure and oral contraceptives were ambiguous. Associated diseases included hypertension (n = 4), malignancies (n = 3), autoimmune diseases (n = 3) and Borrelia infection (n = 1). Immunological studies (including serology and direct immunofluorescence) were noncontributory. The response to antimalarial treatment was good in > 80% of cases. Worsening or recurrence of the lesion after treatment discontinuation, or in the course of the disease, occurred in 31% of patients. Conclusions We present the largest REM case series to date. The reticular pattern with involvement of the midline of the chest and back, the predilection for middle-aged women, the controversial relationship with photosensitivity and the possible association with other conditions such as malignancies and thyroid dysfunctions are the main characteristics that makes REM a recognizable disease.

REM and LET present some differences in the infiltrate, including PDCs, the mucin deposition and the immunoreactant deposition at the dermo-epidermal junction that justify the distinction of the two diseases and suggest different pathogenetic mechanisms.

No abstract

Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune blistering diseases of the skin and/or mucous membranes caused by the presence of antibodies against adhesion molecules on the cell surface of keratinocytes. In genetically predisposed patients, several factors, including drugs, physical agents, neoplasms, hormones, and viruses, notably herpes simplex virus (HSV), have been hypothesized to trigger or exacerbate the disorder. To clarify whether HSV infection represents an aetiopathogenetic factor for pemphigus or a consequence of the immunosuppressive treatment, skin and/or mucosal swabs from 35 patients with pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigus foliaceus were tested for HSV by polymerase chain reaction. Twenty-three of these patients were newly diagnosed, while the remaining 12 had had a previous diagnosis and were under treatment with low-dosage oral corticosteroids. Repeat swabs were taken two weeks after starting intensive immunosuppressive therapy in 8 HSV-negative patients. All skin swabs (n=27) resulted negative for both HSV-1/2, while oral swabs (n=30) were positive for HSV-1 in 5 out of the 12 patients who were being treated with oral corticosteroids, but in none (n=19) of the non-treated group (p=0.0067, X2 test). Five out of the 8 patients with repeat swabs became positive for HSV-1, prompting us to start antiviral therapy. In conclusion, HSV is unlikely to be a triggering factor for pemphigus, but its presence in pemphigus lesions seems to be a frequent and early complication of immunosuppression.