Malondialdehyde (MDA), a biomarker of lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress, is a mutagenic and carcinogenic compound that can react with DNA to form several types of DNA adducts including the deoxyguanosine adduct (M1dG). The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the association between individual dietary and lifestyle habits and M1dG levels, measured in peripheral leukocytes in a large representative sample of the general population of Florence City (Italy). Selected anthropometric measurements, detailed information on dietary and lifestyle habits and blood samples were available for 313 adults of the Florence City Sample enrolled in the frame of European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition (EPIC) study. A multivariate regression analysis adjusted for selected individual characteristics possibly related to M1dG levels (sex, age, BMI, smoke, physical activity level, education level, total caloric intake and a Mediterranean dietary score) was performed to estimate the association between these parameters and M1dG levels. M1dG levels were significantly higher in women (P = 0.014) and lower in moderately active or active subjects (P = 0.037).We also found a significant inverse association with the Modified Mediterranean dietary score (P for trend = 0.049), particularly evident for the highest categories of adherence. Our results indicate that M1dG levels can be modulated by selected individual characteristics such as gender, physical activity and a Mediterranean dietary pattern.

Background: Ovarian Reserve (OR) is a term which describes the functional potential of the ovary, which constitutes the size of the ovarian follicle pool and reflects the number and quality of the oocytes which are within it. Assessment of the OR helps in reflecting the reproductive potential of women. Various markers are available for assessing the OR and the best marker is the Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH) which reflects the ovarian follicular pool in the ovary. In this study, the serum level of AMH/ MIS(Mullerian Inhibiting Substance)was estimated to assess the ovarian reserve in both fertile and infertile women.

Purpose The prevalence of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the second most common type of breast cancer, accounts for 5%–15% of all invasive breast cancer cases. Its histological feature to spread in rows of single cell layers explains why it often fails to form a palpable lesion and the lack of sensitivity of mammography and ultrasound (US) to detect it. It also has a higher incidence of multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral disease when compared to the other histological subtypes. The clinicopathologic features and outcomes of Invasive Ductolobular Carcinoma (IDLC) are very similar to the ILC. The purpose of our study is to assess the importance of MRI in the preoperative management and staging of patients affected by ILC or IDLC. Materials and Methods We identified women diagnosed with ILC or IDLC. We selected the patients who had preoperative breast MRI. For each patient we identified the areas of multifocal, multicentric, or contralateral disease not visible to standard exams and detected by preoperative MRI. We analyzed the potential correlation between additional cancer areas and histological cancer markers. Results Of the 155 women who met our inclusion criteria, 93 (60%) had additional cancer areas detected by MRI. In 61 women, 39,4% of the overall population, the additional cancer areas were confirmed by US/tomosynthesis second look and biopsy. Presurgical MRI staging changed surgical management in the 37,4% of the patients. Only six patients of the overall population needed a reoperation after the initial surgery. No statistically significant correlation was found between MRI overestimation and the presence of histological peritumoral vascular/linfatic invasion. No statistically significant correlation was found between additional cancer areas and histological cancer markers. Conclusions Our study suggests that MRI is an important tool in the preoperative management and staging of patients affected by lobular or ductolobular invasive carcinoma.

The way of communication of ionizing radiation risks did not affect the results of the post-CT survey. Indeed, the interest in the topic did not rise in the post-CT survey in any of the group. Adequate information about ionizing radiation risks provided together with dose exposure information may be useful. However, there is not a standardized better way of communicating information on ionizing radiation risks due to CT.