Summary Background Ustekinumab is a recognised treatment for moderate‐to‐severe Crohn’s disease. We aimed to examine its effectiveness in an adult population in three London centres, and to identify patient, disease or drug‐related factors associated with effectiveness. Methods A retrospective observational study on adults with Crohn’s disease prescribed Ustekinumab between 2017 and 2019. The primary outcome was clinical response at Week 12. Other outcomes included clinical response at Week 52, clinical remission at Weeks 12 and 52, disease activity on biochemical markers (CRP and faecal calprotectin), endoscopic remission (resolution of ulceration at ileocolonoscopy) and fistula improvement or closure in a subset of patients with perianal fistulising disease. Results A total of 134 patients with a median follow‐up of 12 months. Clinical response and remission rates were 58% and 46% at 12 weeks and 64% and 57.5% at 52 weeks respectively. Median HBI score reduced from 9 to 5 at 12 weeks and to 4 at 52 weeks. Concomitant reduction in C‐reactive protein and calprotectin and endoscopic healing or improvement (52%). Twelve per cent experienced at least one adverse event, 22% discontinued Ustekinumab and 31% required rescue therapy. Rescue therapy with corticosteroids was independently associated with short time to treatment discontinuation. Conclusion Clinical response and remission rates were comparable to other studies. Previous exposure to biologics and longer disease duration were associated with less favourable outcomes. Rescue therapy with corticosteroids was the only factor independently associated with treatment discontinuation. Future studies should examine outcomes of Ustekinumab prescribed early in the disease course.
Background Good quality Care in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes the provision of patient-relevant information.1 Data on the level of patient understanding is lacking. We studied patients’ understanding of their IBD condition. Methods The IBD team and patient representatives devised a 16-item questionnaire that collected data on baseline demographics and disease-specific characteristics. Answers denoting understanding were scored positively. A sum (Q-sum) of the individual question scores was expressed as median (range). Results 150 patients were surveyed (49% male). Thirty-nine per cent had ulcerative colitis, 51% Crohn’s Disease and 10% IBD-unclassified. There were: 39 aged <30, 94 aged 30–60, and 15≥60. The median (range) Qsum was 9 (1–16). Twelve per cent of patients had a Qsum of ³13. The Qsum of patients < 60 years old was 10 (2–16) compared with 7 (1–13) of the ≥60 age group (p = 0.02). Sixty-two per cent of the younger and 60% of the older group perceived themselves as well informed (p = 0.9). The Qsum scores were 12 (2–14), 10 (2–16) and 8.5 (3–14) for patients with disease duration of ≤1 year, 2–15 and ≥15 years respectively (p < 0.05). There was no difference in scores according to disease and medication type. 96% of patients in the <60 age group were willing to access online information compared with 60% in the ≥60 age group (p < 0.01). Younger patients were more confident in recognising symptoms of a flare [86%] compared with those aged ≥60 [60%] (p = 0.01), and were also more likely to understand how their condition may progress compared with older patients (66% vs. 40%, p < 0.05). Among patients <60 years only 14% of males and 26% of females (p = 0.08) reported having enough information on fertility. Sixty-six per cent of patients on biologic drugs and 53% on non-biologic drugs considered themselves well informed (p = 0.12). Forty-six per cent of the non-biologics cohort also reported low levels of knowledge on self-management of mild flares. Seventy-six per cent of the biologics group and 87% of the non-biologics group expressed willingness for information on self-management (p = 0.1). Conclusion Older patients are less well informed, less confident in recognising symptoms of a flare, and less likely to access on-line resources. The level of knowledge inversely correlated with disease duration. This may reflect the heightened recent awareness on the inclusion of patient education in clinical care and availability of resources. There is an interest in receiving information on self-management of mild flares. Education sessions should be personalised according to patient characteristics and objective measures such as PAM score (Insignia Health), implemented to show benefits. Reference
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.