Electron auroral energy flux is characterized by electron hemispheric power (Hpe) estimated since 1978 from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) satellites after the estimates were corrected for instrumental problems and adjusted to a common baseline. Similarly, intersatellite adjusted ion hemispheric power (Hpi) estimates come from one MetOp and four NOAA satellites beginning in 1998. The hemispheric power (Hp) estimates are very crude, coming from single satellite passes referenced to 10 global activity levels, where the Hpi estimates are the difference between the total and the electron Hp (Hpi = Hpt‐Hpe). However, hourly averaged NOAA/DMSP Hpe and Hpi estimates correlate well with hourly Polar Ultraviolet Imager (UVI) Hpt and Imager for Magnetopause‐to‐Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE) far ultraviolet (FUV) Hpe and Hpi estimates. Hpe winter values were larger than summer values ∼65% of the time (when geomagnetic activity was moderate or higher), and Hpe were larger in the summer ∼35% of the time (typically for low geomagnetic activity). Hpe was ∼40% larger at winter solstice than summer solstice for the largest Hp from mostly nightside increases, and Hpe was ∼35% larger in summer than winter for the smallest Hp owing to dayside auroral enhancements. Ion precipitation differed from electron precipitation because it was almost always larger in summer than winter. Hpe and Hpi increased with Kp, solar wind speed (Vsw), and negative Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) Bz, similar to previous studies. Hpi also increased strongly with positive Bz. For quiet conditions, Hpe increased with increasing 10.7‐cm solar flux (Sa), while Hpi increased with Sa up to Sa ∼115 for all conditions.
The most dynamic part of the Jovian UV aurora is located inside the main auroral oval. This region is known to regularly show localized but dramatic enhancements on timescales of several tens of seconds, called polar flares. They have often been associated with the polar cusp, based on their location in the polar cap. The present study is based on the longest high‐time resolution image sequences ever acquired by the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph aboard the Hubble Space Telescope. We report the first observations of a regularity in the occurrence of these flares, with a timescale of 2–3 minutes. We use a magnetic flux mapping model to identify the region corresponding to these emissions in the equatorial plane: the radial distance ranges from 55 to 120 Jovian radii and the local times are between 10:00 and 18:00. The analogy with similar phenomena observed at Earth suggests that these quasi‐periodic auroral flares could be related to pulsed reconnections at the dayside magnetopause. Indeed, the flares' projected location in the equatorial plane and their rate of re‐occurrence show some similarities with the properties of the flux transfer events observed by the Pioneer and Voyager probes.
[1] Shock-induced aurora observed with satellite-borne ultraviolet imagers shows distinct characteristics from the more common and extensively studied aurora generated during magnetospheric substorms. It is initiated in the noon sector immediately following dynamic pressure pulses associated with the arrival of enhanced solar wind plasma at the front of the magnetosphere. The auroral brightening rapidly propagates toward the dawn and dusk sectors and may eventually trigger the development of an auroral substorm on the nightside. The FUV imaging system on board the IMAGE satellite has the ability to discriminate between proton and electron precipitation. This feature has been used to study the morphology and dynamics of the electron and proton precipitation following pulse-induced magnetospheric perturbations. A different dynamic is observed for aurora caused by electron and proton precipitation, as well as the important role played by the north-south component of the interplanetary magnetic field. The propagation from the noon to the night sector mainly occurs through the afternoon region for proton precipitation and the morning sector for electron aurora, as expected from azimuthal drift of newly injected plasma. The asymmetry of the precipitation distribution around the noon-midnight axis is more pronounced during negative B z periods, when activity is the most important. The magnitude of both the interplanetary magnetic field and the solar wind speed appears well correlated with the precipitated power, by contrast with the solar wind density and the magnitude of the dynamic pressure, which appear to play a minor role. It is suggested that adiabatic compression and plasma waves play an important role on the locations of electron and proton precipitation in the dayside.
[1] The Far Ultraviolet (FUV) imaging system on board the IMAGE satellite provides a global view of the north auroral region in different spectral channels. The Wideband Imaging Camera (WIC) is sensitive to the N 2 LBH emission and NI emissions produced by both electron and proton precipitations. The SI12 camera images the Lyman-a emission due to incident protons only. We compare WIC and SI12 observations with model predictions based on particle measurements from the TED and the MEPED detectors on board NOAA-TIROS spacecraft. Models of the interaction of auroral particles with the atmosphere are used together with the in situ proton and electron flux and characteristic energy data to calculate the auroral brightness at the magnetic footprint of the NOAA-15 and NOAA-16 orbital tracks. The MEPED experiment measures the precipitating particles with energy higher than 30 keV, so that these comparisons include all auroral energies, in contrast to previous comparisons. A satisfactory agreement in morphology and in magnitude is obtained for most satellite overflights. The observed FUV-WIC signal is well modeled if the different spatial resolution of the two sensors is considered and the in situ measurements properly smoothed. The calculated count rate includes contributions from LBH emission, the NI 149.3 nm line, and the OI 135.6 nm line excited by electrons and protons. The proton contribution in WIC can locally dominate the electrons. The comparisons indicate that protons can significantly contribute to the FUV aurora at specific times and places and cannot be systematically neglected. The results confirm the shift of the proton auroral oval equatorward of the electron oval in the dusk sector. We also show that in some regions, especially in the dusk sector, high-energy protons dominate the proton energy flux and account for a large fraction of the Lyman-a and other FUV emissions.
On April 28 2001, simultaneous global images of electron and proton aurora were obtained by IMAGE‐FUV following a sudden increase of solar wind dynamic pressure. The local time and intensity distribution of both types of precipitation are examined and compared. It is found that the electron and the proton precipitation both start in the post noon sector and expand concurrently, but the expansion into the nightside starts sooner for the protons than for the electrons. The characteristic rise time in the onset sector is on the order of 6 minutes. A distinct dynamics and morphology of electron and proton precipitation is observed in the nightside sector. DMSP electron measurements in the afternoon sector indicate that the shock has a significant effect on the electron spectral characteristics. It is suggested that the various Alfven frequencies generated by the shock account for the two different speeds of propagation of the disturbance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.