This study shows clearly that the most important influencing factor on the mothers' decision to continue breastfeeding is the LOS. Thus more emphasis should be put on encouraging mothers to continue lactation throughout their babies' hospital stay.

Introduction: Minimization of noise exposure is an important aim of modern neonatal intensive care medicine. Binasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) generators are among the most important sources of continuous noise in neonatal wards. The aim of this study was to find out which CPAP generator creates the least noise. Method: In an experimental setup, two jet CPAP generators (Infant Flow® generator and MediJet®) and two conventional CPAP generators (Bubble CPAP® and Baby Flow®) were compared. Noise production was measured in decibels in an A-weighted scale [dB(A)] in a closed incubator at 2 mm lateral distance from the end of the nasal prongs. Reproduction of constant airway pressure and air leak was achieved by closure of the nasal prongs with a type of adhesive tape that is semipermeable to air. Results: The noise levels produced by the four generators were significantly different (p < 0.001). Values measured at a continuous constant flow rate of 8 l/min averaged 83 dB(A) for the Infant Flow® generator with or without sound absorber, 72 dB(A) for the MediJet®, 62 dB(A) for the Bubble CPAP® and 55 dB(A) for the Baby Flow®. Conclusion: Conventional CPAP generators work more quietly than the currently available jet CPAP generators.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) systems for preterm infants work with conventional ventilators or use a jet ventilation system. It is assumed that the most important advantage of jet-CPAP systems is a lower expiratory resistance (R(E) ). We investigated the R(E) of seven different CPAP systems. We studied two primary-care CPAP systems, three jet-CPAP generators, and two conventional CPAP devices. All devices were adjusted at 6 mbar and connected with a test lung simulating a standardized expiration volume. Maximum pressure increase during expiration was measured and maximum R(E) was calculated. In primary-care CPAP devices, the maximum R(E) of the Benveniste valve was 9.7 mbar/L/s (SD 1.2) while that of the Neopuff was 102.8 mbar/L/s (SD 7.9) (P < 0.01). In jet-CPAP devices, the R(E) of the Infant Flow was 6.8 mbar/L/s (SD 1.7), the one of the Medijet REF 1000 was 43.5 mbar/L/s (SD 1.5), and that of the Medijet REF 1010 was 36.7 mbar/L/s (SD 0.3) (P < 0.01). In conventional CPAP systems, the R(E) of the Baby Flow was 29.7 mbar/L/s (SD 1.1) and that of the Bubble CPAP was 37.1 mbar/L/s (SD 4.3) (P < 0.01). All CPAP devices created an R(E). Jet-CPAP devices did not produce lower R(E) than conventional CPAP devices.

CO2 elimination time with and without closed suction device was nearly identical for the Y-piece without flow sensor and for the dead-space free-flow sensor. With both systems, ventilation requirements were significantly lower than for the integrated flow sensor and for the small dead-space flow sensor (integrated flow sensor vs dead-space free-flow sensor 23.6 and 24.5%, respectively, small dead-space flow sensor vs dead-space free flow sensor 11.7 and 10.9%, respectively); thus, we think that introduction of the innovative dead-space free-flow sensor into clinical practice might reduce incidence and severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia by reduction of volutrauma.

Our study shows that indirect ophthalmoscopy without specula causes significantly less stress to infants than screening with lid specula and scleral indentation.