We have cloned the hisH tyrA wild-type genes of Bacillus subtilis with the aid of the chimeric plasmid pBJ194, which replicates both in B. subtilis and Escherichia coli. Primary cloning was done in E. coli. The original E. coli clone, carrying the recombinant plasmid (pGR1) which complements hisH tyrA mutants of B. subtilis, was selected directly from a mixture of plated E. coli clones by replicaplating these clones onto minimal agar plates without tyrosine, spread just before with competent B. subtilis cells. After overnight incubation clusters of small colonies had developed exclusively in the E. coli [pGR1] colony prints. The Tyr+ minicolonies were shown to be B. subtilis carrying pGR1 because (i) their appearance depended linearly on the number of B. subtilis cells plated, (ii) they produced extracellular protease and amylase and (iii) plasmids could be reisolated from the minicolonies and used to transform B. subtilis recE4 tyrA1 both to Cmr and Tyr+. Plasmid pGR1 transfer through replica plating was compared with plasmid transfer in liquid. Both systems depended on transformable B. subtilis strains and were sensitive to DNAseI. However, whereas integration of the tyrA+ gene into the chromosome and concomitant loss of plasmids occurred frequently during regular plasmid transformation of Rec+ B. subtilis, this was a rare event during plasmid transfer through replica plating.

RNase-unfolded chromosomes of competent Bacillus subtilis are able to take up single-stranded homologous donor DNA fragments in vitro to form donor-recipient DNA complexes (Van Randen and Venema 1981). The unfolded chromosomes behave as supercoiled DNA molecules. X-irradiation increased the formation of unstable and stable complexes between donor and recipient DNA during incubation at 37 degrees C. The complex-forming ability of the unfolded chromosomes increased linearly with increasing X-ray dose, even after complete relaxation of the unfolded chromosomes had occurred. Limited DNase I action increased the complex-forming ability of the chromosomes as effectively as X-irradiation. Unstable donor-recipient DNA complexes can be distinguished from stable ones by their dissociation upon density gradient centrifugation in CsCl at pH 11.2. They are stable at pH 10 (Van Randen et al. 1982a). At an intermediate pH value during isopycnic centrifugation, a fraction of the unstable complexes were stable, suggesting that a range of stabilities existed among the unstable complexes. The donor moiety of the stable donor-recipient DNA complexes was far more resistant to nuclease S1 treatment than that of the unstable ones.