No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Abstract. 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and its esters have been under intense investigation to enhance the endogenous production of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) in tumour cells for the purpose of photodynamic diagnosis. In this study we have investigated the use of exogenous PpIX and its dimethyl ester (PME) and compared the results with endogenous PpIX produced via 5-ALA and ALA methyl ester (AME) in poorly differentiated NPC/CNE-2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells in both in vivo and in vitro systems. All prodrugs and photosensitizers were administered to tumour bearing balb/c nude mice either intravenously or topically. In vitro results show that 5-ALA induced more PpIX fluorescence when compared with AME in NPC/CNE-2 cells and PME showed better uptake than PpIX. In vivo results show that exogenous PpIX and PME show promise as good candidates as photosensitizers for photodynamic diagnosis as they exhibit significant selectivity between tumour tissue and normal tissue at 3 h. Modification of delivery vehicle used for application of exogenous PpIX and PME could allow for rapid uptake; better selectivity and localization of the photosensitizer.

The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid and its esters to induce endogenous porphyrins for the purpose of detection of epithelial cancers is being studied extensively in many centr.es around the world. The challenge is to prepare an efficacious formulation for the purpose of cancer detection. Photodynamic diagnosis of cancer using 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and its ester derivatives is being actively investigated. In this study, we compared ALA with ALA methyl ester (AME) derivative in terms of PplX fluorescence intensity in in vitro and in vivo systems of bladder carcinoma. For the in vivo system consisting of RT112 xenografts, the modes of drug administration compared were intravenous administration and topical application. The Karl Storz fluorescence endoscopy system was used to obtain macroscopic fluorescence images. The macroscopic images were further analysed for fluorescence intensity distribution. For the intravenous administration, over all time points studied (1, 3, 6 h), AME-PpIX fluorescence was lower than ALA-PplX fluorescence and was cleared at a faster rate than the ALA-PplX when administered intravenously. Topical application with two different polymers, Gantrez and Polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) which are fast releasing polymers was found to be comparable in inducing PpIX fluorescence. Topical AME-PplX fluorescence was found to be comparable with ALA-PpIX fluorescence. The results of this study suggest that the AME can also be used as a good diagnostic agent.