Delayed recovery/awakening/ emergence can occur under anaesthesia and is multifactorial, could be drug or non drug related. Similarly, we report a case of delayed recovery in a 68-year-old patient, for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a known case of hypertension, bronchial asthma and hypothyroidism. Preoperatively, she was optimised for her medical disorders; however, she had delayed recovery from general anaesthesia. The delayed recovery, often, would be expected in a case of hypothyroidism, however in our patient it was found to be associated with inadvertent hypokalemia.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Regional anaesthesia is the recommended technique for upper and lower limb surgeries with better postoperative profile.The brachial plexus block provides a useful alternative to general anesthesia, for upper limb surgeries. Supraclavicular approach for brachial plexus block is most commonly suitable for upper limb surgeries and post operative pain relief. Aims and objectives: The aim of this study was designed to compare clonidine and dexmedetomidine, used as an adjunct to bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block in terms of efficacy in onset, duration and potency of sensory and motor block, sedation score and analgesia. Study design: In this prospective, double blind randomized controlled clinical trial, 60 American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 1 and 2 (ASA 1, 2) patients aged between 18 to 60 years, scheduled for upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular block were selected. Materials and methods: The patients were divided into two groups: Group C (n= 30) comprised of patients who received bupivacaine 0.25% (35 cc) + injection clonidine 1 mcg / kg and Group D (n= 30) who received bupivacaine 0.25% (35 cc) + inj dexmedetomidine 1 mcg / kg. Onset, duration of sensory and motor blockade, duration, efficacy and potency of postoperative analgesia, sedation score and any untoward side effects, if any were observed at scheduled intervals. Statistics and Results: The mean time for onset of sensory block in group D was (9.17±1.26) mins and that observed in group C was (11.07±2.14) mins. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Time to achieve complete sensory block in group D was (14.80 ± 1.37) mins and in group C was (16.40±2.09) mins. This difference was statistically insignificant (p > 0.005). Mean duration of sensory block in group D was (690 ± 87.41) mins and in group C was (470 ± 55) mins. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) (p = 0.001) The mean time for onset of motor block in group D was (12.63 ± 2.18) mins and (15.17±1.77) mins in group C. The difference was found to be statistically significant (p< 0.005)( p=0.0001) The mean time for complete motor block in group D was (20.40 ± 3.02) mins and (20.17±2.60) mins in group C. The difference was found to be statistically insignificant (p> 0.005) ( p= 0.750). The mean duration of motor block in group D was (353.17 ± 41.24) mins and in group C was (270.51 ± 51.61) mins. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.005) (p = 0.001). The duration of analgesia was (721.33 ± 88.27) mins in group D and (516.00±45.15) mins in group C (p< 0.05) This difference was statistically as well as clinically significant. No patient in any group required intra-operative supplementation with analgesia or general anaesthesia during the surgical procedure. Conclusion: From our results we conclude that the onset of sensory and motor block is faster with dexmedetomidine (group D) compared to clonidine (group C), both dexmedetomidine and clonidine prolong the duration of sensory and motor block, more prolonged with dexmedetomidine. Both dexmedetomidine and clonidine have been found to have favourable effect on duration of postoperative analgesia. Significant prolongation of duration of analgesia is seen with dexmedetomidine as compared to clonidine.