Context. Reports from patients and health care workers dealing with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) underscore experiences of isolation and fear. Some of this experience results from the distancing effect of masks, gloves, and gowns known as personal protective equipment (PPE). One approach to bridging the divide created by PPE is the use of PPE portraits, postcard-sized pictures affixed to PPE. Objectives. Our confidential electronic mail-based survey aimed to quantify provider attitudes toward PPE portraits. Methods. PPE portraits were piloted at an academic safety-net health system experiencing a COVID-19 patient surge during AprileMay 2020, necessitating use of full PPE for COVID-positive patients and surgical masks in all hospital settings. Our survey assessed staff exposure to PPE portraits, attitudes toward PPE portraits, and potential program expansion. For staff wearing PPE portraits, we also assessed perceptions of interactions with other staff and patients/families and impact on personal well-being. The University of Massachusetts Medical School's Institutional Review Board designated this as a quality improvement project (#H00020279). Results. More than half of survey respondents (n ¼ 111 of 173; 64%) reported exposure to PPE portraits. Attitudes toward PPE portraits were positive overall, with agreement that PPE portraits were a good idea (89%), improved provider mood (79%), enhanced perception of team connection (72%), and more positive among those who reported exposure. Openended responses (n ¼ 41) reinforced positive survey data and also raised concerns about infection control (n ¼ 6), cost/ logistics (n ¼ 5), and provider vulnerability (n ¼ 3). Conclusion. Providers report that PPE portraits may represent a positive patient-centered idea that helps reassure patients, is well received by interdisciplinary staff, and may enhance patient and team interactions. Potential adaptations to address concerns include photo pins and donor/patient and family experience department support for costs.

Introduction Goals-of-care (GOC) conversations are essential to ensure high-quality care for people with serious illness. We developed a simulation experience to train internal medicine residents in GOC conversations near end of life, followed by a real-life GOC conversation as a Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) including direct feedback from participating patients. Methods The 3-hour simulation session trained teams of two learners each to interact with standardized patients portraying a patient with end-stage heart failure and an accompanying family member. Residents completed pre- and postsurveys regarding their self-assessed abilities and confidence in conducting these conversations. Piloted in 2016, the Mini-CEX was completed in 2017 with 28 residents 3–9 months after simulation. Patients and participating family members were invited to complete an optional, deidentified survey of their experience. Results From 2015 to 2017, 84 residents completed simulation training. Ninety percent of postsurvey responders felt more prepared to conduct GOC conversations after simulation compared to 42% before training. Eighty percent or more reported confidence in discussing GOC (previously 67%), prognosis (previously 62%), and hospice (previously 49%). Analysis of Mini-CEX scores revealed that the majority of residents' skills were the same or improved compared with their performance in simulation; more than 70% demonstrated improvement in ensuring patients' comfort, displaying empathy, and recognizing/responding to emotion. Almost all patients and families reported feeling heard and satisfied with their conversation with the resident. Discussion This curriculum was well received, and initial data support its effectiveness in enhancing residents' self-perceived confidence and interpersonal skills in real-world patient encounters.

Context/Objectives: It is paramount that clinicians assess and document patients' priorities to guide goal-concordant interventions, especially during a public health crisis. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Academic safety-net medical center in central Massachusetts, United States. Methods: We examined electronic medical records (EMRs) to discern goals-of-care (GOC) conversations with COVID-19 patients seen at some point by palliative care during their hospitalization, and all clinicians' use of a structured note template during the peak incidence of COVID-19 from March to May 2020. Patients were grouped based on comorbidities and preadmission living situation. GOC discussions were categorized into three types: code status decisions, other treatment decisions, and no treatment decisions. Results: Nearly all (97%) patients had GOC documentation within 48 hours of admission. Forty-four percent of first GOC conversations incorporated the template. Patients with dementia living in nursing facilities had GOC documentation within hours of hospital admission, whereas healthier patients had their first GOC conversation at one week of hospitalization. Decisions about code status predominated in the first (83%) and second (49%) discussions, followed by a focus on other treatment decisions in subsequent discussions (44%-57%). Many did not require a treatment decision (19%-27%) but focused on quality-of-life definitions. Nearly all survivors were discharged to a facility and only four patients returned home. Many survivors died within three months (case fatality rate: 77%). Conclusions: GOC documentation using a structured template combined with easy EMR retrievability and clinician training holds promise for aligning patients' values with real-time medical decisions, during and after the pandemic.