To conduct an integrative scoping review of the physical, psychological and social experiences of women who have experienced chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). Method: An integrative review was undertaken. A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycInfo identified 23 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Data relating to women's experiences of alopecia was extracted and synthesized thematically. Results: Four analytical themes were formed; 'the physical and psychological effect of alopecia', 'more than the loss of hair', 'the complexities of a visual cancer identity' and 'coping with new internal and external relationships'. CIA involves a public and private representation of illness which disrupts women's identity and their acceptance in public, yet this is a highly individualised experience. There is disparity in current evidence regarding the experience of CIA for women among older age groups, with rarer forms of cancer, haematological malignancies and those receiving palliative care or targeted treatment modalities. Conclusions: This review highlights the continued pervasive psychosocial implications arising from CIA, however this is not exclusive to scalp hair as alopecia from the face and body has also been found to require adaptation and effective coping. Limited knowledge exists on the experience of alopecia induced by treatment for haematological cancers and rarer-tumour groups and emerging systemic anti-cancer treatment modalities. Healthcare professionals must endeavour to support and discuss the potential risks of alopecia, and provide patients with an opportunity to voice their fears, concerns, and experiences of CIA. Future research should incorporate the identified underserved populations and the experience of newer therapies.

Objective: To establish an understanding of the unmet needs of people living with or beyond a lymphoma diagnosis. Survivors of lymphoma are at increased risk of unmet needs due to cancer, treatment-related toxicities and extended survivorship.Despite the rapidly growing numbers of lymphoma survivors, their needs and research priorities are underserved and undervalued, therefore left largely unaddressed.Methods: A rapid review method and reflexive thematic analysis approach assimilated current knowledge. Eligibility criteria included quantitative, qualitative, or mixed approaches employing cross-sectional, longitudinal, cohort or review designs focused on the needs of adult lymphoma survivors (any subtype or stage of disease).Five databases: CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsycInfo and Scopus, were systematically searched.Results: Forty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria via a stringent screening process facilitated by NVivo. Almost 60 per cent of articles were published within the last five years and investigated a homogenous lymphoma sample. Most studies employed quantitative approaches (77%) and cross-sectional designs (67%). Studies were of high methodological quality. Five major themes were identified: disparity in health service delivery, the psychological impact of cancer, impactful and debilitating concerns, the monetary cost of survival and insufficient provision of survivorship information. A meta-analytical approach was not feasible due to the breadth of methodologies of included studies. Conclusions:This review shows that lymphoma survivors experience a myriad of unmet needs across multiple domains, reinforcing the need for lymphoma-specific research. However, more research is needed to advance and achieve informed decision-making relating to survivorship care, placing due attention to the needs and research priorities of lymphoma survivors.

No abstract