Introduction The demand for prophylactic mastectomy has increased significantly over the last 10 years. This can be explained by a substantial gain of knowledge about the clinical risk and outcome of patients with high risk mutations such as BRCA1 and 2, the improved diagnostic possibilities for detecting the genetic predisposition for the development of breast cancer and the awareness for those mutations by health care professionals as well as patients. In addition to expander-to-implant reconstruction and microsurgical flap surgery, definitive immediate reconstruction with subpectoral insertion of breast implants is often preferred. The prosthesis is covered at its inferior pole by a synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix. In these cases, in addition to the silicone prosthesis, a further foreign body must be implanted. This can be exposed in the event of wound healing disorder or necrosis of the usually thin soft tissue covering after subcutaneous mastectomy, thus calling into question the reconstructive result. In this study, the coverage of the lower pole by a caudal deepithelialized dermis flap, which allows the implant to be completely covered with well vascularized tissue, is compared to coverage by a synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix. Patients and methods From January 2014 to June 2020, 74 patients (106 breasts) underwent breast reconstruction following uni or bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Reconstruction was performed with autologous tissue (15 breasts), with tissue expander or implant without implant support (15 breasts), with implant and use of an acellular dermal matrix or synthetic mesh (39 breasts) and with implant and caudal dermis flap (37 breasts). In this study, we compared the patients with implant and dermal matrix/mesh to the group reconstructed with implant and dermal flap. Results In the group with the caudal dermis flap, 4 patients developed skin necrosis, which all healed conservatively due to the sufficient blood supply through the dermis flap. In the group with the use of a synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix, skin necrosis was found in three cases. In one of these patients the implant was exposed and had to be removed. Discussion For patients with excess skin or macromastia, the caudal dermis flap is a reliable and less expensive option for complete coverage of an implant after prophylactic mastectomy. In particular, the vascularized dermis flap can protect the implant from the consequences of skin necrosis after prophylactic mastectomy.

Background: The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score (LRINEC) is a simple tool used to support early diagnosis of Necrotizing Fasciitis (NF). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the LRINEC is suitable as a progression and prognosis parameter in patients with NF. Methods: In this retrospective study, laboratory data of 70 patients with NF were analyzed. The LRINEC was calculated for every patient at the time of hospital admission and postoperatively after surgical interventions. Furthermore, the LRINEC was examined as a prognostic factor for survival. Results: The overall lethality of our series was 20 out of 70 (28.6%). A highly significant LRINEC decrease was found for serial debridements. The largest decrease was observed after the first debridement. There was a significant difference between the initial LRINEC of deceased and surviving patients. A cut off value of >6.5 (7 LRINEC points) resulted in an optimal constellation of sensitivity (70%) and specificity (60%) to predict lethality in patients with NF. Conclusions: The LRINEC significantly decreases after surgical debridement. An initial LRINEC equal or greater than seven is an independent prognostic marker for lethality and can help to identify high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting (AFG) has been established over the past two decades as an additive technique during and after breast reconstruction. Complete reconstruction of the breast mound with AFG alone represents an exceptional technique that has been published mostly in case reports or in studies with limited cases. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of three different techniques for breast reconstruction on the recovery of skin sensitivity at the reconstructed breast. METHODS: The study included 30 patients after mastectomy following breast cancer. Three groups were examined: A) breast reconstruction by autologous fat grafting (AFG), B) breast reconstruction by deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP) and C) breast reconstruction by expander/implant (TE). Biometric data were compared; sensitivity tests were performed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. The non-operated, healthy contralateral breasts of the patients were used as a reference. RESULTS: While the traditional reconstruction techniques by microsurgical anastomosed perforator flap or expander/implant showed a strongly decreased or completely missing sensitivity of the skin, the tests after reconstruction by AFG represented high values of sensory recovery, which came close to the reference group of non-operated breasts. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare skin sensitivity after AFG-based reconstruction to established techniques for breast reconstruction. We could demonstrate in a limited group of patients, that breast reconstruction by autologous fat grafting can achieve higher values of skin sensitivity compared to traditional techniques.

BACKGROUND: Lipolytic injectables for body contouring procedures have been reported for necrotic effects on adipose tissue causing side effects as swelling, pain and hematoma. Deoxycholic acid is widely used as a solvent in lipolytic injectables and is associated with necrosis when applied to cells. A new lipolytic preparation (NWL-10) containing only polyenylphosphatidylcholine in nano particle size, glycerrhizinate and maltose has been reported for its lipolytic action on adipose tissue. However, no data exist whether the NWL-10 mixture is responsible for apoptosis or necrosis in adipose tissue which can be associated with severer side effects as reported for deoxycholic acid preparation. METHODS: 3T3-L1 mouse cells and human adipose tissue derived stem cells were exposed to the NWL-10 mixture and to each ingredient of the mix in order to investigate cytotoxic, lipolytic, necrotic or apoptotic effects. Furthermore, a Balb/C mouse animal model was used to investigate inflammatory responses to NWL-10 by bioluminescence monitoring and histological examination. RESULTS: A high extent of lipolysis was detected for the NWL-10 mixture when applied to both cell types with no cytotoxic effect. Interestingly, low concentration of NWL-10 resulted in necrosis whereas high concentration of NWL-10 showed a certain amount of apoptosis. Application of single ingredients of NWL-10 or various combinations of two component mixtures did not result in any apoptosis or necrosis. In addition, no inflammatory effects of NWL-10 were observed in the mouse model. CONCLUSIONS:The NWL-10 mixture provided promising results regarding lipolysis on adipose tissue with limited apoptosis and necrosis when compared to currently available injectables. These first promising results require further fundamental and more detailed research on essentials for drug approval. NWL-10 has the potential to become a second generation product for future lipolytic injectables.

No abstract