No abstract

Purpose: A paradigm shift in the management of small renal masses has increased utilization of active surveillance. However, questions remain regarding safety and durability in younger patients. Materials and Methods: Patients aged 60 or younger at diagnosis were identified from the Delayed Intervention and Surveillance for Small Renal Masses registry. The active surveillance, primary intervention, and delayed intervention groups were evaluated using ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, c 2 and Fisher's exact tests, and Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.Results: Of 224 patients with median followup of 4.9 years 30.4% chose surveillance. There were 20 (29.4%) surveillance progression events, including 4 elective crossovers, and 13 (19.1%) patients underwent delayed intervention. Among patients with initial tumor size 2 cm, 15.1% crossed over, compared to 33.3% with initial tumor size 2e4 cm. Overall survival was similar in primary intervention and surveillance at 7 years (94.0% vs 90.8%, log-rank p[0.2). Cancer-specific survival remained at 100% for both groups. There were no significant differences between primary and delayed intervention with respect to minimally invasive or nephron-sparing interventions. Recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 96.0% and 100% for primary and delayed intervention, respectively (log-rank p[0.6). Conclusions: Active surveillance is a safe initial strategy in younger patients and can avoid unnecessary intervention in a subset for whom it is durable. Crucially, no patient developed metastatic disease on surveillance or recurrence after delayed intervention. This study confirms active surveillance principles can effectively be applied to younger patients.

Azoospermia is classified as the complete absence of sperm in ejaculate and accounts for 10–15% of male infertility. Many anticancer drugs are known to cause defects in spermatogenesis, but the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapy on spermatogenesis remains largely unknown. Presented here is a normozoospermic man (60 million sperm/cc of ejaculate) who received a trial combination treatment of Ipilimumab/Nivolumab to treat BRAF negative, stage IV metastatic melanoma. Two years after the treatment, the patient presented as completely azoospermic. The patient subsequently underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction, during which no sperm was retrieved, and sertoli-only pathology was elucidated.