Introduction The degree and duration of response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in EGFR mutated lung cancer are heterogeneous. We hypothesized that the concurrent genomic landscape of these tumors, which is currently unknown in view of the prevailing single gene assay diagnostic paradigm in clinical practice, could play a role in clinical outcomes and/or mechanisms of resistance. Methods We retrospectively probed our institutional lung cancer database for tumors with EGFR kinase domain mutations that were also evaluated by more comprehensive molecular profiling, and evaluated tumor response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Results Out of 171 EGFR mutated tumor-patient cases, 20 were sequenced using at least a limited comprehensive genomic profiling platform. 50% harbored concurrent TP53 mutation, 10% PIK3CA mutation, 5% PTEN mutation, among others. The response rate to EGFR TKIs, the median progression-free survival (PFS) to TKIs, the percentage of EGFR-T790M TKI resistance and survival had higher trends in EGFR mutant/TP53 wild-type cases when compared to EGFR mutant/TP53 mutant tumors (all p>0.05 without statistical significance); with a significantly longer median PFS in EGFR-exon 19 deletion mutant/TP53 wild-type cancers treated with 1st generation EGFR TKIs (p=0.035). Conclusions Concurrent mutations, specifically TP53, are common in EGFR mutated lung cancer and may alter clinical outcomes. Additional cohorts will be needed to determine if comprehensive molecular profiling adds clinically relevant information to single gene assay identification in oncogene-driven lung cancers.

Background The continued development of targeted therapeutics for cancer treatment has required the concomitant development of more expansive methods for the molecular profiling of the patient’s tumor. We describe the validation of the JAX Cancer Treatment Profile™ (JAX-CTP™), a next generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular diagnostic assay that detects actionable mutations in solid tumors to inform the selection of targeted therapeutics for cancer treatment. Methods NGS libraries are generated from DNA extracted from formalin fixed paraffin embedded tumors. Using hybrid capture, the genes of interest are enriched and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 or MiSeq sequencers followed by variant detection and functional and clinical annotation for the generation of a clinical report. Results The JAX-CTP™ detects actionable variants, in the form of single nucleotide variations and small insertions and deletions (≤50bp) in 190 genes in specimens with a neoplastic cell content of ≥10%. The JAX-CTP™ is also validated for the detection of clinically actionable gene amplifications. Conclusions There is a lack of consensus in the molecular diagnostics field on the best method for the validation of NGS-based assays in oncology, thus the importance of communicating methods, as contained in this report. The growing number of targeted therapeutics and the complexity of the tumor genome necessitates continued development and refinement of advanced assays for tumor profiling to enable precision cancer treatment.

The expanded gene panel identified a variety of clinically actionable gene alterations in TNBCs. The identification of such variants increases the possibility for new therapeutic interventions and clinical trial eligibility for TNBC patients.

Benign ovarian Brenner tumors often are associated with mucinous cystic neoplasms, which are hypothesized to share a histogenic origin and progression, however, supporting molecular characterization is limited. Our goal was to identify molecular mechanisms linking these tumors. DNA from six Brenner tumors with paired mucinous tumors, two Brenner tumors not associated with a mucinous neoplasm, and two atypical proliferative (borderline) Brenner tumors was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples and sequenced using a 358-gene next-generation sequencing assay. Variant calls were compared within tumor groups to assess somatic mutation profiles. There was high concordance of the variants between paired samples (40% to 75%; P < 0.0001). Four of the six tumor pairs showed KRAS hotspot driver mutations specifically in the mucinous tumor. In the two paired samples that lacked KRAS mutations, MYC amplification was detected in both of the mucinous and the Brenner components; MYC amplification also was detected in a third Brenner tumor. Five of the Brenner tumors had no reportable potential driver alterations. The two atypical proliferative (borderline) Brenner tumors both had RAS mutations. The high degree of coordinate variants between paired Brenner and mucinous tumors supports a shared origin or progression. Differences observed in affected genes and pathways, particularly involving RAS and MYC, may point to molecular drivers of a divergent phenotype and progression of these tumors.

Introduction: A comprehensive somatic tumor profile with associated treatment selection options requires the detection of gene fusions. After evaluating the clinical utility of multiple methods of gene fusion detection, it was determined that the Archer FusionPlex Solid Tumor Panel (AFPSTP) best compliments the JAX Cancer Treatment ProfileTM (JAX-CTPTM) clinical test in terms of workflow, specimen requirements and turnaround time. Here we describe our analytical validation process for the AFPSTP assay. Methods: AFPSTP was validated using 24 samples: 5 JAX Patient Derived Xenograft (PDX) cases, 4 translocation positive controls, 2 FFPE cancer samples, 1 normal tissue sample, and 12 cell lines. Nine of the cell lines were previously identified as positive for fusion transcripts and 3 lacked detectable fusion events. The validation was executed in 5 phases: (1) confirm that AFPSTP was able to detect known fusion or lack of fusion events in characterized specimens; (2) determine inter-assay concordance; (3) determine intra-assay concordance; (4) LOD and (5) sensitivity. Results: The fusion detection results for this validation are listed in Table 1. All but one of these fusion events was previously identified. The one novel fusion was confirmed using TaqMan RT-PCR. In addition to the expected fusions, 4 false positive events were detected, 2 due to mispriming and 2 determined to be WT read through transcripts. The fusion detection inter and intra-assay concordance was found to be 100% and the sensitivity was calculated to be 91.67% at a LOD of 5%. Conclusion: This analysis outlines the clinical validation of the incorporation of AFPSTP into the JAX-CTPTM test system. Once incorporated, the AFPSTP assay will accomplish the goal of making JAX-CTPTM a more comprehensive somatic tumor profiling assay without affecting the current acceptable turnaround time or required input material. List of 15 samples that were found to be fusion positive and the corresponding detected fusion.HorizonDx EML4/ALK PositiveEML4 → ALK variant 1HorizonDx RET PositiveCCDC6 → RETHorizonDx ROS PositiveSLC34A2 → ROS1HorizonDx Triple PositiveEML4 → ALK variant 3bHorizonDx Triple PositiveSLC34A2 → ROS1HorizonDx Triple PositiveCCDC6 → RETA673 Cell LineEWSR1 → FLI1VCaP Cell LineTMPRSS2 → ERGKM-12 Cell LineTPM3 → NTRK1RPMI-2650 Cell LineBRD4 → NUTM1NCI-H716 Cell LineFGFR2 → COL14A1OCI-AML2 Cell LineMBNL1 → RAF1REH Cell LineETV6 → RUNX1MDA-MB-175-VII Cell LineTENM4 → NRG1ASPS-1 Cell LineTFE3 → ASPSCR1ASPS-1 Cell LineASPSCR1 → TFE3PDX1EML4 → ALK 3bPDX2SYN2 → PPARG Citation Format: Samantha Helm, Aleksandra Ras, Vanessa Spotlow, Kevin Kelly, Susan Mockus, Cara Statz, Guruprasad Ananda, Joan Malcolm, Gregory J. Tsongalis. Validation of the Archer FusionPlex solid tumor panel in the JAX cancer treatment profileTM. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3630.