ObjectiveTo assess the added value of the optic nerve region (by using visual evoked potentials [VEPs]) to the current diagnostic criteria.MethodsFrom the Barcelona clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) cohort, patients with complete information to assess dissemination in space (DIS), the optic nerve region, and dissemination in time at baseline (n = 388) were selected. Modified DIS (modDIS) criteria were constructed by adding the optic nerve to the current DIS regions. The DIS and modDIS criteria were evaluated with univariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses with the time to the second attack as the outcome. A subset of these patients who had at least 10 years of follow-up or a second attack occurring within 10 years (n = 151) were selected to assess the diagnostic performance. The analyses were also performed according to CIS topography (optic neuritis vs non–optic neuritis).ResultsThe addition of the optic nerve as a fifth region improved the diagnostic performance by slightly increasing the accuracy (2017 DIS 75.5%, modDIS 78.1%) and the sensitivity (2017 DIS 79.2%, modDIS 82.3%) without lowering the specificity (2017 DIS 52.4%, modDIS 52.4%). When the analysis was conducted according to CIS topography, the modDIS criteria performed similarly in both optic neuritis and non–optic neuritis CIS.ConclusionThe addition of the optic nerve, assessed by VEP, as a fifth region in the current DIS criteria slightly improves the diagnostic performance because it increases sensitivity without losing specificity.

Purpose: Spreading depolarization (SD) phenomena are waves of neuronal depolarization, which propagate slowly at a velocity of 1 to 5 mm/minute and can occur in patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, traumatic brain injury, and migraine with aura. They form part of secondary injury, occurring after spreading ischemia. The purposes of this study were to describe the frequency and characteristics of SD phenomena and to define whether a correlation existed between SD and outcome in a group of patients with TBI and large hemispheric ischemic stroke. Methods: This was a prospective observational study of 39 adult patients, 17 with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction and 22 with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, who underwent decompressive craniectomy and multimodal neuromonitoring including electrocorticography. Identification, classification, and interpretation of SDs were performed using the published recommendations from the Cooperative Study on Brain Injury Depolarization group. The outcomes assessed were functional disability at 6 and 12 months after injury, according to the extended Glasgow outcome scale, Barthel index, and modified Rankin scale. Results: Four hundred eighty-three SDs were detected, in 58.9% of the patients. Spreading depolarizations were more common, particularly the isoelectric SD type, in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (P < 0.04). In 65.21% of patients with SDs on electrocorticography, the “peak” day of depolarization was day 0 (the first 24 hours of recording). Spreading depolarization convulsions were present in 26.08% of patients with SDs. Patients with more SDs and higher depolarization indices scored worse on extended Glasgow outcome scale (6 months) and Barthel index (6 and 12 months) (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Evidence on SD phenomena is important to ensure continued progress in understanding their pathophysiology, in the search for therapeutic targets to avoid additional damage from these secondary injuries.

No abstract