Objective: Treatments against osteoporosis have demonstrated fracture risk reduction but persistence to therapy remains a major issue. Intermittent regimens have been developed to improve persistence. The aim of this 1-year prospective study was to compare, in the general population, the persistence of various oral regimens of antiosteoporotic treatment. Methods: We conducted this prospective study in the French comprehensive public health insurance database of the Rhône-Alpes region. Women aged 45 years or older who had a first reimbursement of an oral antiosteoporotic treatment during February 2007 composed the study cohort. Persistence was defined by the proportion of patients refilling a prescription in the pharmacist delivery register (ERASME). Using statistical analyses like Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests, we compared the treatment persistence of strontium ranelate, raloxifene, and daily-, weekly-, and monthly bisphosphonates. Results: Two thousand four hundred and nineteen patients were included over a period of 1 month and followed up for 12 months. Two hundred and eighty-nine (11.9%) patients were treated with monthly bisphosphonates, 1298 (53.7%) with weekly bisphosphonates, and 832 (34.4%) with daily treatments (526 strontium ranelate (21.7%), 296 raloxifene (12.2%), and 10 bisphosphonates (0.4%)). At 1 year, overall persistence was 34%. Fifty percent of patients on monthly bisphosphonates were still persistent while only 37% of patients on weekly bisphosphonates, 34% on raloxifene, and 16% on strontium ranelate were persistent. Therapy monitoring with biochemical markers or bone mineral density was associated with improved persistence. Conclusion: Overall persistence at 1 year was low, but intermittent regimens were associated with higher persistence rates, along with women who had therapy monitoring.
Three quarters of women initiating OP treatment were supplemented with calcium and/or vitamin D in agreement with current recommendations. This represents a high co-prescription rate.
Heat shock proteins (HSP) are synthesized in living tissues exposed to transient increase in temperature and play a central role in the protective response against heat and other stresses. In fruits, this response to heat treatment provides resistance to a physiological alteration known as chilling injury. Despite the physiological importance of this group of proteins, publications comparing different methodological alternatives for their analysis are rather scarce. In the present paper, we conducted a comparative study using different electrophoretic and immunological techniques to evaluate the HSP response in fruits. Proteins were extracted from tomato fruit exposed to an HSP-inducing temperature (38 °C) for different times (0, 3, 20, and 27 h). Different alternatives of analysis (SDS-PAGE, SDS-PAGE followed by IEF, Western blot, and dot blot) were performed, and their potential application discussed. The study was complemented with a practical application, in which tomatoes were subjected to heat and anaerobic treatments and then stored in a chill-inducing temperature. This application evidences the relevance of knowing the level of proteins attained by stress treatments which correlates with the acquired tolerance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.