Background
In a previous study, participation in a 16-week reverse integrated care and group behavioral and educational intervention for individuals with diabetes and serious mental illness was associated with improved glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c) and BMI. To inform future implementation efforts, more information about the effective components of the intervention is needed.
Objective
The goal of this study is to identify the aspects of the intervention participants reported to be helpful and to evaluate the predictors of outcomes.
Methods
This study involved qualitative evaluation and post hoc quantitative analysis of a previous intervention. Qualitative data were collected using semistructured interviews with 69% (24/35) of the individuals who attended 1 or more group sessions and 35% (9/26) of the individuals who consented but attended no sessions. Quantitative mixed effects modeling was performed to test whether improved diabetes knowledge, diet, and exercise or higher group attendance predicted improved hemoglobin A1c and BMI. These interview and modeling outcomes were combined using a mixed methods case study framework and integrated thematically.
Results
In qualitative interviews, participants identified the application of health-related knowledge gained to real-world situations, accountability for goals, positive reinforcement and group support, and increased confidence in prioritizing health goals as factors contributing to the success of the behavioral intervention. Improved knowledge of diabetes was associated with reduced BMI (β=–1.27, SD 0.40; P=.003). No quantitative variables examined were significantly associated with improved hemoglobin A1c levels.
Conclusions
In this mixed methods analysis of predictors of success in a behavioral diabetes management program, group participants highlighted the value of positive reinforcement and group support, accountability for goals set, and real-world application of health-related knowledge gained. Improved diabetes knowledge was associated with weight loss.
Participation in a 16-week, reverse-integrated care, group behavioral and educational intervention for individuals with diabetes and serious mental illness was associated with improved glycemic control (HbA1C) and body mass index (BMI).
OBJECTIVE
Here we aimed to identify elements of patient experience and evaluate predictors of outcome.
METHODS
In order to better understand key components of the intervention, quantitative and qualitative data were collected utilizing a mixed methods case study framework. Mixed effects modeling was performed to identify predictors of improved HbA1C and BMI. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 24/35 (69%) of those who attended one or more group sessions and 9/25 (36%) of those who consented but attended no sessions. Independent qualitative and quantitative analytics were integrated thematically.
RESULTS
No factors tested were significantly associated with improved HbA1C. Improved diabetes knowledge was associated with reduced BMI (P=0.003). Qualitative interviews identified health-related knowledge gains and application to real world situations, positive reinforcement by group leaders and peers, accountability for goals, group support, and increased confidence in the ability to prioritize health goals as factors contributing to success of the behavioral intervention from the participants’ perspective.
CONCLUSIONS
This mixed methods analysis supports further study of a combined educational and behavioral intervention for diabetes self-management in adults with diabetes and serious mental illness in which improved diabetes knowledge was associated with weight loss. Participants highlighted the value of the group model as well as positive reinforcement, accountability, and real-world application of knowledge gained for improving health related knowledge, behavior, and outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.