No abstract

In comparison to historical series, adjuvant therapy, stricter follow up and imaging technology advances result in earlier diagnosis of fitter breast cancer patients with low-volume hepatic and systemic relapse. Cost-effectiveness of close monitoring for early diagnosis of relapse should be further studied. With availability of effective modern chemotherapy, prolonged survival is feasible and aggressive multidisciplinary management of selected patients may be warranted.

Purpose In the critically ill, hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSI) are associated with significant mortality. Granular data are required for optimizing management, and developing guidelines and clinical trials. Methods We carried out a prospective international cohort study of adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) with HA-BSI treated in intensive care units (ICUs) between June 2019 and February 2021. Results 2600 patients from 333 ICUs in 52 countries were included. 78% HA-BSI were ICU-acquired. Median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was 8 [IQR 5; 11] at HA-BSI diagnosis. Most frequent sources of infection included pneumonia (26.7%) and intravascular catheters (26.4%). Most frequent pathogens were Gram-negative bacteria (59.0%), predominantly Klebsiella spp. (27.9%), Acinetobacter spp . (20.3%), Escherichia coli (15.8%), and Pseudomonas spp . (14.3%). Carbapenem resistance was present in 37.8%, 84.6%, 7.4%, and 33.2%, respectively. Difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) was present in 23.5% and pan-drug resistance in 1.5%. Antimicrobial therapy was deemed adequate within 24 h for 51.5%. Antimicrobial resistance was associated with longer delays to adequate antimicrobial therapy. Source control was needed in 52.5% but not achieved in 18.2%. Mortality was 37.1%, and only 16.1% had been discharged alive from hospital by day-28. Conclusions HA-BSI was frequently caused by Gram-negative, carbapenem-resistant and DTR pathogens. Antimicrobial resistance led to delays in adequate antimicrobial therapy. Mortality was high, and at day-28 only a minority of the patients were discharged alive from the hospital. Prevention of antimicrobial resistance and focusing on adequate antimicrobial therapy and source control are important to optimize patient management and outcomes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-022-06944-2.

No abstract

There are limited data regarding the long term follow up after thalidomide based regimen and the outcome of patients when they progress and they receive further treatment. We reassessed our original series of 43 patients with previously treated multiple myeloma who had received a pulsed cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone (CTD) regimen. Among the 43 patients, 14 did not respond to pulsed CTD and 29 (67%) achieved at least a partial response. The median PFS for all patients was 10 months. After a median follow up of 24 months (range 1 - 62), the 3 year PFS is 14% and 3 patients remain off treatment and without progression for 55+, 55+ and 56+ months respectively. Moreover, 28% of patients who progressed after CTD achieved a partial response after subsequent treatment which included thalidomide, bortezomib or lenalidomide. The median PFS of these patients was 5 months and the 1 year PFS was 20%. Furthermore, 31% of patients who had responded to CTD and then progressed (CTD sensitive) responded to subsequent treatment. We conclude that some patients enjoy long responses after CTD and that several patients who progress after CTD may respond to treatment with a novel agent-based regimen.