1 This randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted to assess the effect of tenidap sodium 120 mg, a novel anti-arthritic cytokine modulating drug, on the hypotensive efficacy of the thiazide diuretics hydrochlorothiazide or bendrofluazide. 2 Twenty-three male and female patients, aged 41-78 years, with mild to moderate, uncomplicated, essential hypertension controlled with thiazide diuretic therapy, received either a single daily dose of tenidap sodium 120 mg or matched placebo for 22 days in addition to their diuretic therapy. Changes between baseline and endpoint in supine and standing systolic and diastolic pressures and pulse rate were compared between treatment groups. 3 Daily treatment with tenidap reduced the anti-hypertensive efficacy of the thiazide diuretics. Blood pressure tended to increase marginally and the increase in mean standing diastolic pressure observed with tenidap was significantly greater than the change in the placebo group. All pressures tended to decrease in the placebo group and all endpoint measurements were within 7 mm Hg of baseline in both groups. 4 Treatment-related side effects of mild to moderate severity were reported in two subjects receiving tenidap, but in neither case was treatment discontinued. Two subjects receiving placebo also experienced side effects considered to be treatment-related and both were withdrawn from the study. 5 The results of this study suggest that tenidap may be given to patients treated for mild to moderate essential hypertension controlled with thiazide therapy; however, the patient's blood pressure should be regularly monitored.Keywords tenidap sodium hypertension thiazide diuretic hypotension drug interaction arthritis

1. The effects of tenidap sodium and placebo on digoxin pharmacokinetics were compared in 14 healthy young men, in a double-blind, parallel-group study lasting for 24 days. 2. Subjects were administered digoxin alone for the first 10 days and digoxin plus tenidap 120 mg day-1 or placebo for the remaining 14 days. 3. Changes in the means between day 10 (digoxin monotherapy) and day 24 (combined therapy) for renal clearance, area under the plasma concentration-time curve during the dosing interval, and the minimum and maximum plasma digoxin concentrations did not differ significantly between the tenidap and placebo groups. There was a small but statistically significant increase (0.5 h) in the time taken to reach maximum plasma digoxin concentration following 14 days' continuous tenidap co-administration compared with placebo, but this was not considered to be clinically meaningful. 4. Co-administration of tenidap and digoxin was well tolerated. No subject withdrew from the study during combination treatment. Treatment-related adverse events were of mild to moderate severity and were reported by four subjects on digoxin monotherapy, four on tenidap and digoxin, and by two on digoxin and placebo. Those reported by the tenidap group predominantly affected the gastrointestinal system and were mild in severity. There were no reports of laboratory test abnormalities or cardiovascular abnormalities related to combined digoxin and tenidap administration. 5. The results of this study indicate that, in healthy young men, co-administration of tenidap with digoxin does not have any apparent clinically significant effects on the pharmacokinetic profile of digoxin, and the treatment is well tolerated.

1 A randomised, placebo controlled, double-blind, parallel group study was conducted to assess the effect of tenidap sodium, a novel cytokine modulating drug, on the stable hypotensive response to the angiotension converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril in subjects with mild to moderate, uncomplicated, essential hypertension. 2 Twenty-four male and female hypertensives, aged 33-77 years, received either 120 mg tenidap sodium or matched placebo daily for 22 days concomitantly with enalapril. 3 Mean endpoint supine and standing, systolic and diastolic pressures remained within 10% of baseline in each treatment group. However, the endpoint values were marginally above baseline during double-blind treatment with tenidap and marginally below baseline in the group receiving placebo. The increases in supine and standing systolic pressures in the tenidap group differed significantly from the changes in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between groups in changes in pulse rate. 4 Gastrointestinal side effects of mild to moderate severity attributed to treatment with tenidap were experienced by five subjects, one of whom was withdrawn during the third week of treatment. One subject receiving placebo was withdrawn because of a moderate headache attributed to study treatment. 5 The results of this study suggest that treatment with tenidap may interfere with the anti-hypertensive efficacy of ACE inhibitors. It is recommended that blood pressure should be monitored when tenidap is administered concomitantly with an ACE inhibitor.