Recent genomic studies challenge the conventional model that each metastasis must arise from a single tumor cell and instead reveal that metastases can be composed of multiple genetically distinct clones. These intriguing observations raise the question: How do polyclonal metastases emerge from the primary tumor? In this study, we used multicolor lineage tracing to demonstrate that polyclonal seeding by cell clusters is a frequent mechanism in a common mouse model of breast cancer, accounting for >90% of metastases. We directly observed multicolored tumor cell clusters across major stages of metastasis, including collective invasion, local dissemination, intravascular emboli, circulating tumor cell clusters, and micrometastases. Experimentally aggregating tumor cells into clusters induced a >15-fold increase in colony formation ex vivo and a >100-fold increase in metastasis formation in vivo. Intriguingly, locally disseminated clusters, circulating tumor cell clusters, and lung micrometastases frequently expressed the epithelial cytoskeletal protein, keratin 14 (K14). RNA-seq analysis revealed that K14 + cells were enriched for desmosome and hemidesmosome adhesion complex genes, and were depleted for MHC class II genes. Depletion of K14 expression abrogated distant metastases and disrupted expression of multiple metastasis effectors, including Tenascin C (Tnc), Jagged1 (Jag1), and Epiregulin (Ereg). Taken together, our findings reveal K14 as a key regulator of metastasis and establish the concept that K14+ epithelial tumor cell clusters disseminate collectively to colonize distant organs.uring metastasis, cancer cells escape the primary tumor, travel through the circulation, and colonize distant organs. Conventional models of cancer progression propose that each metastasis arises from the clonal outgrowth of a single tumor cell and this conceptual framework is a foundation for models, such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and migratory cancer stem cells (1).Challenging the generality of the single-cell/single-metastasis model are long-standing clinical observations that tumor cell clusters (also termed "tumor clumps") are also observed across the stages of metastasis. Tumor cell clusters are detected in the bloodstream of cancer patients (2), clusters can efficiently seed metastases (3), and though rare, circulating tumor cell (CTC) clusters have prognostic significance (4, 5). Furthermore, metastases are composed of multiple genetically distinct tumor cell clones, in mouse models of breast, pancreas, and small cell carcinoma (5-7), and in human metastatic prostate cancer patients (8). Taken together, these observations provide accumulating evidence that tumor cell clusters contribute to metastasis. However, they leave unresolved two important questions: how do tumor cell clusters emerge from the primary tumor, and which molecular features identify cell clusters that metastasize?An important clinical observation is that cancer cells invade the surrounding stroma as cohesive clusters in the majority of ...

Metastasis is the major driver of cancer deaths and begins when cancer cells invade surrounding tissues. Invasion and metastasis have been proposed to initiate following loss of the intercellular adhesion protein, E-cadherin (E-cad) 1,2 , based upon inverse correlations between in vitro migration and E-cad levels 3. This hypothesis is inconsistent, however, with the observation that most breast cancers are invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) and express E-cad in primary tumors and metastases 4. To resolve this discrepancy, we tested the genetic requirement for E-cad in metastasis using murine and human models of both luminal and basal IDC. Here we show that E-cad promotes metastasis in IDC. While loss of E-cad increased invasion, it also reduced cancer cell proliferation and survival, circulating tumor cell number, seeding of cancer cells in distant organs, Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:

The characterization of cancer genomes has provided insight into somatically altered genes across tumors, transformed our understanding of cancer biology, and enabled tailoring of therapeutic strategies. However, the function of most cancer alleles remains mysterious, and many cancer features transcend their genomes. Consequently, tumor genomic characterization does not influence therapy for most patients. Approaches to understand the function and circuitry of cancer genes provide complementary approaches to elucidate both oncogene and non-oncogene dependencies. Emerging work indicates that the diversity of therapeutic targets engendered by non-oncogene dependencies is much larger than the list of recurrently mutated genes. Here we describe a framework for this expanded list of cancer targets, providing novel opportunities for clinical translation.