Aim: To study the skeletal, dental effects and evaluate the soft tissue changes with PowerScope-fixed functional appliance in class II malocclusion. Materials and methods: This clinical study was carried out where a total of 10 growing (CVMS 3 and 4) Class II Division 1 malocclusion patients, indicated for treatment with fixed functional appliance were allocated based on specific inclusion criteria. PowerScope (American Orthodontics) was used as the fixed functional appliance. Skeletal, dental and soft tissue effects of the appliance with various angular and linear parameters on a digital lateral cephalogram were evaluated for all 10 participants. Records were collected before the insertion of PowerScope appliance (T0) and after 5 months, during the appliance removal (T1). All participants were treated with 0.018ʺ×0.025ʺ MBT (3M Unitek) prescription. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test to compare individual mean changes for each treatment category.  Results: Statistically significant changes were seen in skeletal parameters such as forward positioning of the mandible with an increase in SNB angle and N perpendicular-Pogonion distance, the class II jaw base relationship improved with reduction in ANB angle and Wits appraisal. Significant changes were observed in dental parameters such as forward positioning of mandibular incisors, maxillary molar distalization and intrusion with reduction in overbite and overjet respectively. In the soft tissue, a significant improvement in facial profile was seen due to an increase in labiomental angle. Conclusions: The results of this study have shown that statistically significant changes in skeletal, dental and soft tissue parameters

No abstract

Objective: To compare the amount and rate of maxillary incisor intrusion by varying position of mini-implants. Materials and Methods: Twenty four subjects having deep bite were randomly allocated to two groups: Group I where a single mini-implant was placed in the alveolar region between the roots of maxillary central incisors and a force of 60 grams was applied with elastic chain tied from mini-implant to wire. Group II where mini-implants were placed bilaterally in the alveolar region between thee roots of maxillary lateral incisors and canines and a force of 30 grams (total 60 grams) was applied on each side. Lateral cephalograms taken before intrusion and 4 months after intrusion. Data was analyzed by means of independent sample 't' test and paired 't' test. Results: The maxillary incisors showed a significant amount of intrusion in both groups but there was no significant difference in the amount and rate of intrusion between the two groups (P > 0.01). Minimal molar extrusion was seen in both the groups but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Both the methods for maxillary incisor intrusion are effective as there was no statistically significant difference but two mini-implants are preferred as they cause relatively less proclination of maxillary incisors.

Introduction: Orthodontic correction of Angle’s class II molar relation has, for long, been one of the challenges in orthodontics, with various researchers attempting to correct the class II molar relationship by diverse methods. One of the techniques that has gained popularity in recent times is maxillary arch distalization by infrazygomatic screws and miniscrews. The objective of the study is to measure and compare the amount of maxillary arch distalization and its effects, on adjacent teeth, by varying the positions of mini-implants by Finite Element Analysis. Materials & Method: A standard three-dimensional finite element model was constructed to simulate the maxillary teeth, periodontal ligament, and alveolar process. In this study, three models were prepared. Model-1: The (miniscrews) were placed between upper first and second premolar, and between second premolar and first molar bilaterally. Model-2: Infrazygomatic screws was placed between upper first and second molar bilaterally. Model-3: Infrazygomatic screws was placed on the mesio-buccal root of upper first molar bilaterally. The displacement of each tooth was calculated on x, y, and z axes when 200 gm of force was applied on each side. Result: Maximum amount of maxillary arch distalization was seen when infrazygomatic screws placed between upper first and second molar in model-2. Whereas maximum amount of maxillary arch intrusion and less distalization was observed when miniscrews placed between upper first premolar and second premolar and in between second premolar and upper first molar in model-1. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.005*). There was no bucco-palatal rotation of teeth observed among all three finite element models. Conclusion: Thus infrazygomatic screws and miniscrews are the effective means of maxillary arch distalization for the correction of Class II malocclusion.

Introduction: Various force systems are used in orthodontics to move teeth, such as continuous, intermittent and interrupted. Teeth responds differently to these orthodontic forces. Aims: The aim of the study is to compare the rate of canine retraction with intermittent and interrupted forces. Materials and Methods: A split mouth study was carried among eighteen participants. One side of maxillary arch randomly received interrupted force with elastomeric powerchain while other received intermittent force with elastics with magnitude of 150-170g for canine retraction on each side. For 15 weeks, participants were asked to wear the elastics 8 hours a day whereas the elastomeric powerchains were replaced by operator every 5 weeks. The outcomes were assessed using scanned images of study models collected at the beginning (T0) and 15 weeks later (T3) as well on OPG. Linear and angular measurements were used to measure the distal movement, rotation as well tipping of canines and the results were statistically analysed using Independent t-test. Results: The distal movement of canine on the interrupted force side was 0.98mm/5weeks and on the intermittent force side was 1.06mm/5weeks. The distopalatal rotation on interrupted and intermittent force side was 8.38° and 5.72°. Tipping measured on OPG was 5.72° and 5.27° for interrupted and intermittent force. No statistically significant differences were found. Conclusion: The rate of canine retraction with interrupted force and intermittent force showed no statistically significant differences. Less canine rotation and tipping with intermittent force compared to interrupted force though not statistically significant.