No abstract

The ocean's mean dynamic topography (MDT) is the surface representation of ocean circulation. It may be determined by the ocean approach, using numerical ocean circulation models, or by the geodetic approach, where MDT is the height of the mean sea surface (MSS), or mean sea level (MSL), above the geoid. Using new geoid models, geodetic MDT profiles based on tide gauges, dedicated coastal altimetry products, and conventional altimetry are compared with six ocean MDT estimates independent of geodetic data. Emphasis is put on the determination of high‐resolution geoid models, combining ESA's fifth release (R5) of GOCE satellite‐only global gravity models (GGMs) with a regional geoid model for Norway by a filtering technique. Differences between MDT profiles along the Norwegian coast together with Taylor diagrams confirm that geodetic and ocean MDTs agree on the ∼3–7 cm level at the tide gauges, and on the ∼5–11 cm level at the altimetry sites. Some geodetic MDTs correlate more with the best‐performing ocean MDT than do other ocean MDTs, suggesting a convergence of the methods. While the GOCE R5 geoids are shown to be more accurate over land, they do not necessarily show the best agreement over the ocean. Pointwise monomission altimetry products give results comparable with the multimission DTU13MSS grid on the ∼5 cm level. However, dedicated coastal altimetry products generally do not offer an improvement over conventional altimetry along the Norwegian coast.

New‐generation synthetic aperture radar altimetry, as implemented on CryoSat‐2, observes sea surface heights in coastal areas that were previously not monitored by conventional altimetry. Therefore, CryoSat‐2 is expected to improve the coastal mean dynamic topography (MDT). However, the MDT remains highly reliant on the geoid. Using new regional geoid models as well as CryoSat‐2 data, we determine three geodetic coastal MDT models in Norway and validate them against independent tide‐gauge observations and the operational coastal ocean model NorKyst800. The CryoSat‐2 MDTs agree on the ∼3–5 cm level with both tide‐gauge geodetic and ocean MDTs along the Norwegian coast. In addition, we compute geostrophic surface currents to help identifying errors in the geoid models. We find that even though the regional geoid models are all based on the latest satellite gravity data as provided by GOCE, the resulting circulation patterns differ. We demonstrate that some of these differences are due to erroneous or lack of marine gravity data. This suggests that there is significant MDT signal at spatial scales beyond GOCE, and that the geodetic approach to MDT determination benefits from the additional terrestrial gravity information provided by a regional geoid model. We also find that the border of the geographical mode mask of CryoSat‐2 coincides with the Norwegian Coastal Current, making it challenging to distinguish between artifacts in the CryoSat‐2 observations during mode switch and ocean signal.

No abstract

No abstract