The paper aims to examine the position of international law against violence committed by the Myanmar military known as Tatmadaw, against Myanmar which held anti-coup demonstrations in Myanmar. The research used the normative legal research method, with the main source of data collection of legal material containing normative law. The results showed that Myanmar is one of the countries in Southeast Asia whose government has been dominated by the military. In early 2021, the Tatmadaw staged a coup against Myanmar's President Aung San Suu Kyi. The tragedy began in the 2020 elections, in which the National Democratic League (NLD) was elected as the majority to sit in Myanmar's parliament. However, Tatmadaw could have no election results and no coup. Burmese, who did not support a coup by Myanmar's military, made a massive dip in the streets. Tatmadaw performs violent acts for action until 2019. However, from the direction of the protesters, some protesters became victims of violence by the Tatmadaw. It reflects the restrictions on the freedom of speech of the People of Myanmar. Free speech is an important right of the People of Myanmar to be part of the good Human Rights face-to-face by international law through arbitrary ministers by the Tatmadaw. The Tatmadaw's acts of violence against Myanmar violate human rights set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in articles 19 and 29. In addition, freedom of speech is also governed by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in article 19.

The potential for illegal fishing in Indonesia's marine areas is tremendous, especially in Indonesia's exclusive economic zone, particularly in the North Natuna marine area. Following the rampant illegal fishing activities, policies on preventing and eradicating illegal fishing in Indonesia are constantly debated both in theory and implementation. Illegal fishing activities are not only a problem for Indonesia but also a cross-border problem because the perpetrators come from across countries. Therefore the handling of this problem must be cross-border, and implementation of international law is necessary. By using normative legal research, the paper analyzed law enforcement of illegal fishing by referring to UNCLOS as the basis of international maritime law to obtain legal certainty in illegal fishing in the Indonesian exclusive economic zone (EEZ), especially in the North Natuna sea area. According to Article 73 paragraph 1 UNCLOS 1982, Indonesia can take action against perpetrators of illegal fishing by using its own legal regulations because illegal fishing can interfere with the management rights of Indonesia's marine natural resources.Keywords: Illegal Fishing, Indonesian Exclusive Economic Zone, UNCLOS AbstrakPotensi illegal fishing di wilayah laut Indonesia sangat besar, terutama di zona ekonomi eksklusif Indonesia, khususnya di wilayah laut Natuna Utara. Menyusul maraknya aktivitas illegal fishing, kebijakan pencegahan dan pemberantasan illegal fishing di Indonesia tetap menimbulkan permasalahan yang diperdebatkan baik secara teori maupun implementasinya. Kegiatan illegal fishing tidak hanya menjadi masalah bagi Indonesia, tetapi juga menjadi masalah lintas batas karena pelakunya berasal dari berbagai negara, oleh karena itu penanganan masalah ini harus dilakukan secara lintas batas sehingga diperlukan penerapan hukum internasional. Dengan menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif, makalah ini menganalisis penegakan hukum illegal fishing dengan mengacu pada UNCLOS sebagai dasar hukum maritim internasional untuk memperoleh kepastian hukum dalam tindak pidana illegal fishing di Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia (ZEE), khususnya di laut Natuna Utara. wilayah laut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa menurut Pasal 73 ayat 1 UNCLOS 1982, Indonesia dapat menindak pelaku illegal fishing dengan menggunakan peraturan hukumnya sendiri, karena illegal fishing dapat mengganggu hak pengelolaan sumber daya alam laut Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Illegal Fishing, Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia, UNCLOS