IntroductionIn situ tumor ablation releases a unique repertoire of antigens from a heterogeneous population of tumor cells. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a completely noninvasive ablation therapy that can be used to ablate tumors either by heating (thermal (T)-HIFU) or by mechanical disruption (mechanical (M)-HIFU). How different HIFU ablation techniques compare with respect to their antigen release profile, their activation of responder T cells, and their ability to synergize with immune stimuli remains to be elucidated.Methods and resultsHere, we compare the immunomodulatory effects of T-HIFU and M-HIFU ablation with or without the TLR9 agonist CpG in the ovalbumin-expressing lymphoma model EG7. M-HIFU ablation alone, but much less so T-HIFU, significantly increased dendritic cell (DC) activation in draining lymph nodes (LNs). Administration of CpG following T- or M-HIFU ablation increased DC activation in draining LNs to a similar extend. Interestingly, ex vivo co-cultures of draining LN suspensions from HIFU plus CpG treated mice with CD8+ OT-I T cells demonstrate that LN cells from M-HIFU treated mice most potently induced OT-I proliferation. To delineate the mechanism for the enhanced anti-tumor immune response induced by M-HIFU, we characterized the RNA, DNA and protein content of tumor debris generated by both HIFU methods. M-HIFU induced a uniquely altered RNA, DNA and protein profile, all showing clear signs of fragmentation, whereas T-HIFU did not. Moreover, western blot analysis showed decreased levels of the immunosuppressive cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β in M-HIFU generated tumor debris compared to untreated tumor tissue or T-HIFU.ConclusionCollectively, these results imply that M-HIFU induces a unique context of the ablated tumor material, enhancing DC-mediated T cell responses when combined with CpG.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.