Candida is a dominant fungal pathogen in immunocompromised hosts, leading to opportunistic infections. Complement with its multifaceted functions is involved in the immune defense against this yeast, and recently several novel aspects have emerged in this old battle. It is clear that Candida can adopt both roles as a colonizer or as a pathogen. In our article, we focus on the molecular mechanisms of the Candida-complement interplay, which occur in disseminated disease as well as locally on skin or on mucous membranes in mouth and vagina; the mechanisms can be supposed to be the same. Activation of the complement system by Candida is facilitated by directly triggering the three dominant pathways, but also indirectly via the coagulation and fibrinolysis systems. The complement-mediated anti-Candida effects induced thereby clearly extend chemotaxis, opsonization, and phagocytosis, and even the membrane attack complex formed on the fungal surface plays a modulatory role, although lysis of the yeast per se cannot be induced due to the thick fungal cell wall. In order to avoid the hostile action of complement, several evasion mechanisms have evolved during co-evolution, comprising the avoidance of recognition, and destruction. The latter comes in many flavors, in particular the cleavage of complement proteins by yeast enzymes and the exploitation of regulatory proteins by recruiting them on the cell wall, such as factor H. The rationale behind that is that the fluid phase regulators on the fungal cell surface down-regulate complement locally. Interestingly, however, evasion protein knockout strains do not necessarily lead to an attenuated disease, so it is likely more complex in vivo than initially thought. The interactions between complement and non-albicans species also deserve attention, especially Candida auris, a recently identified drug-resistant species of medical importance. This is in particular worth investigating, as deciphering of these interactions may lead to alternative anti-fungal therapies directly targeting the molecular mechanisms.

Overactivation of the complement system has been characterized in severe COVID-19 cases. Complement components are known to trigger NETosis via the coagulation cascade and have also been reported in human tracheobronchial epithelial cells. In this longitudinal study, we investigated systemic and local complement activation and NETosis in COVID-19 patients that underwent mechanical ventilation. Results confirmed significantly higher baseline levels of serum C5a (24.5 ± 39.0 ng/mL) and TCC (11.03 ± 8.52 µg/mL) in patients compared to healthy controls (p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Furthermore, systemic NETosis was significantly augmented in patients (5.87 (±3.71) × 106 neutrophils/mL) compared to healthy controls (0.82 (±0.74) × 106 neutrophils/mL) (p < 0.0001). In tracheal fluid, baseline TCC levels but not C5a and NETosis, were significantly higher in patients. Kinetic studies of systemic complement activation revealed markedly higher levels of TCC and CRP in nonsurvivors compared to survivors. In contrast, kinetic studies showed decreased local NETosis in tracheal fluid but comparable local complement activation in nonsurvivors compared to survivors. Systemic TCC and NETosis were significantly correlated with inflammation and coagulation markers. We propose that a ratio comprising systemic inflammation, complement activation, and chest X-ray score could be rendered as a predictive parameter of patient outcome in severe SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Pathogenic mucormycetes induce diseases with considerable morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Virulence data comparing different Mucorales species and various underlying risk factors are limited. We therefore compared the pathogenesis of inhalative infection by Rhizopus (R.) arrhizus and Lichtheimia (L.) corymbifera in murine models for predominant risk factors for onset of infection. Mice with diabetes or treated with cyclophosphamide or cortisone acetate were challenged via the intranasal route with an isolate of R. arrhizus or L. corymbifera, respectively. Clinical, immunological and inflammation parameters as well as efficacy of posaconazole prophylaxis were monitored over 14 days. Whereas immunocompetent mice showed no clinical symptoms after mucormycete infection, mice treated with either cyclophosphamide (CP) or cortisone acetate (CA) were highly susceptible. Animals infected with the isolate of R. arrhizus showed prolonged survival and lower mortality, compared to those exposed to the L. corymbifera isolate. This lower virulence of R. arrhizus was risk factor-dependent, since diabetic mice died only after infection with Rhizopus, whereas all Lichtheimia-infected diabetic animals survived. Under posaconazole prophylaxis, both mucormycetes were able to establish breakthrough infections in CA-and CP-treated mice, but the course of infection was significantly delayed. Detailed analysis revealed that susceptibility of CA-and CP-treated mice could not be mimicked by exclusive lack or downmodulation of neutrophils, platelets or complement, but can be supposed to be the consequence of a broad immunosuppressive effect induced by the drugs. Both Lichtheimia corymbifera and Rhizopus arrhizus induce invasive mycoses in immunocompromised hosts after inhalative infection. Key parameters such as virulence and immunopathogenesis vary strongly according to fungal species and underlying risk group. Selected neutropenia is no sufficient risk factor for onset of inhalative mucormycosis.