Background: Instillation of crystalloid flotation agents, such as Ringer's lactate has been suggested for preventing adhesion formation after abdominal surgery, but the efficacy of this approach remains controversial. Objective: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the resorption rates of Ringer's lactate and icodextrin 4% following a pneumoperitoneum with CO 2 and humidification (control) in comparison with a pneumoperitoneum with 86%CO 2 + 10%N 2 O + 4%O 2 together with cooling and humidification (full conditioning). Materials and Methods: Twenty women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy were prospectively randomized to have during surgery with a control or a full-conditioned pneumoperitoneum as well as the instillation of 1000 mL of Ringer's lactate or icodextrin 4% at the end of surgery. Fluid volumes remaining after 24, 48, and 72 hours were measured by ultrasound testing. Results: The peritoneal volumes of Ringer's lactate and icodextrin 4% both decreased exponentially over time. Following a pneumoperitoneum with CO 2 , the resorption rate of Ringer's lactate was faster than for icodextrin 4%. After 24, 48, and 72 hours 11.7 -1.0% versus 38.2 -9.5% ( p = 0.009), 5.3 -0.6% versus 14.9 -4.8% (NS), and 4.2 -0.7% versus 12.1 -4% ( p = 0.03), respectively of the initial 1 L remained. Conditioning decreased the resorption rate of Ringer's lactate and after 24, 48, and 72 hours 25.2 -3.4, 13.2 -1.3 and 6.0 -0.5% remained ( p = 0.03, 0.009, and NS versus the control group), respectively Conditioning did not affect the resorption rate of icodextrin. Conclusions: The absorption of both Ringer's lactate and of icodextrin 4% from the peritoneal cavity was fast and exponential in this pilot study. In the control group, the resorption rate of icodextrin 4% was slightly slower than that of Ringer's lactate. After conditioning, the resorption rate of Ringer's was slower and became comparable to that of icodextrin 4%. ( J GYNECOL SURG 31:139)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.