This study purpose to find out whether there are differences in critical thinking of students using whole-group discussion learning with buzz-group discussion. The method used is a quasi-experimental method with two class groups, ie experimental class with whole-group discussion and control class with buzz-group discussion.The research design used is Nonequivalent Control Group Design. In analyzing the data, each individuals pretest score is subtracted from its posttest score, allowing gain analysis or change. The population in this study are all students of class XI SMK Daarut Tauhid Boarding School Bandung in the odd semester of the academic year 2017/2018. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, generate a statement that the hypothesis proposed by the researcher or alternative hypothesis (H1) accepted and H0 rejected. So that it becomes the basis for researchers to argue that critical thinking experimental class students are different from the critical thinking of control class students. This shows that whole-group discussion of learning can be an alternative in learning discussion if the number of students is equal to or less than 15 people. The whole-group discussion makes students more active in teaching and learning, especially when conducting discussions. Each student has a discussion and responsibility for each group, working together and exchanging answers, discussing inequalities in answering questions, and helping each other solve problems on the practice.

Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan berfikir kreatif siswa pada kategori minat belajar tinggi dan minat belajar rendah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode komparasi dengan analisis data menggunakan uji t (one sampel t-tes) dengan uji hipotesis ANOVA. Populasi yang digunakan siswa juruan akuntansi SMK Medikacom dengaan sampel kelas XI AK A dan B. Penelitian ini dibagi dalam dua kelompok siswa, yaitu kelompok siswa dalam kategori minat belajar tinggi dan siswa dalam kategori minat belajar rendah. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian hipotesis, ditemukan hasil bahwasanya terdapat perbedaan kemampuan berfikir kreatif siswa dalam kategori minat belajar tinggi dan siswa dalam kategori minat belajar rendah. Pembelajaran yang dilakukan guru harus dapat memperhatiakan tingkat minat belajar siswanya karna itu akan mempengaruhi proses dan hasil belajar, termasuk kemampuan berfikir salah satunya berfikir kreatif.

The objectives of the final report of this research are (1) to determine the understanding of students and lecturers in the Merdeka Learning policy program at the Merdeka Campus at the Economic Education Study Program, FKIP, Pasundan University; (2) to find out the involvement of students and lecturers in the Independent Learning Policy Program at the Independent Campus at the Economics Education Study Program, FKIP, Pasundan University. The implementation method in the research program on the implementation of the Independent Learning Policy-Independent Campus (MBKM) is in the form of a population survey (total sampling) involving students, and lecturers at the Pasundan University economic education study program. The survey results show that in general students understand the independent campus learning policy program in the economic education study program FKIP Pasundan University, this is indicated by the average student answers about each question item in the survey showing a response according to the answer indicators provided. Some of the author's suggestions are input as a form of concern for the study program in implementing the MBKM program so that it can be even better, of course the consistency of all human resources involved is very necessary in optimizing the implementation of this MBKM activity.

This study purposes to know the impact of type script cooperative learning of the mutual cooperation behavior on economic subject. Respondents from two classes were selected randomly at the west java provincial school in the country of Indonesia.The study used a pre-test-post-test control group design that was used to compare the impact of cooperative type script and cooperative learning approaches commonly used by teachers in general to know three aspects of mutual cooperation or Gotong Royong (care, tolerance and contribution). The study found significant results in the type script cooperative learning model in improving the behavior of mutual cooperation (care, tolerance and contribution).

Problem formulation in this study, the author tries to answer in a way 1) To find out how the level of creative thinking of Vocational students in the 21st century the author will answer it by using the national examination results analysis data, doing a level analysis of creative thinking and doing tests, 2) To find out how 21st century learning authors will try to find data in the form of relevant research results, 3) To find out how to improve creative thinking will see from the perspective of the model or method of learning based on the results of previous research. The findings in this study 1) the level of students' creative thinking skills are still relatively low 2) 21st century learning is learning that emphasizes the development of creative thinking skills. 3) the effort that can be done as a teacher to improve creative thinking skills is through the use of learning models that can improve individual abilities, independence and the concept of constructivism.