Objective: To explore the eating experience and eating-related quality of life (ERQOL) of communitydwelling older adults with tooth loss. Method: Nineteen older adults from the clinics of a northeast US dental school who met inclusion criteria (>65 y old, <20 teeth, and no dentures) composed the sample. For this mixed methods study, demographic characteristics, number and location of teeth, Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form score, and anthropometrics data were collected; semistructured interviews were conducted to collect in-depth information about the eating experience and ERQOL. Thematic analysis was completed with NVivo 12 software (QSR International). Results: Participants' mean age was 71.3 y (SD = 5.2); 52.6% (n = 10) were women; 63.2% (n = 12) were Black or African American. The mean Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form score of 12.1 was reflective of normal nutrition status; 31.6% (n = 6) of patients were at risk for malnutrition or were malnourished. Fifteen percent (n = 3) were fully edentulous; 84.2% (n = 16) had 1 to 19 teeth (mean = 10.8, SD = 6.5). The 2 overarching themes identified were adaptive and maladaptive behavioral responses to tooth loss. Adaptive strategies included modification in food preparation and cooking methods, food texture selection, meal timing, and approaches to chewing. Maladaptive behaviors included food avoidance and limiting eating and smiling in front of others. Psychosocial factors, including finances, limited food choices and ERQOL, whereas the support of family and friends enhanced ERQOL according to participants. Conclusion: Older adults with tooth loss exhibit both adaptive and maladaptive behaviors that affect their eating experience, dietary intake, and ERQOL. While many expressed positive adaptive coping strategies, they also described maladaptive behaviors, including avoidance of healthy foods and limiting eating during social interactions, which may affect their nutritional status and overall health and well-being. Further research is needed to explore how duration and severity of tooth loss influence these behaviors and risk of malnutrition. Interprofessional approaches are needed to support positive adaptation and coping with tooth loss. Knowledge Transfer Statement: The results of this study can be used by health professionals treating patients with tooth loss in an effort to improve their eating experience and eating-related quality of life. The findings provide data to support further studies and the need for evidence-based guidelines and educational materials to meet the unique needs of older adults with tooth loss.

Background The opioid crisis in America has sparked a shift toward a multimodality perioperative pain regimen. The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the perioperative period decreases opioid consumption and increases efficacy. However, many plastic surgeons avoid their use because of antiplatelet effects. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the plastic surgery literature to assess the risk of intraoperative or postoperative bleeding and hematoma formation. Methods A systematic review of articles published in PubMed was performed in September 2018 to investigate the incidence of increased bleeding and hematoma formation with use of NSAIDs in the perioperative period in plastic surgery. All articles were reviewed for primary outcome measures, and a selective literature review was performed to examine perioperative NSAID use in other surgical subspecialties. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed. Results Our search yielded 806 total articles, with 15 meeting inclusion criteria, and this included 3064 patients (1679 with perioperative NSAIDs, 1385 with no NSAIDs). There was no significant difference in overall incidence of bleeding/hematoma in the treatment group versus control (no NSAIDs). The overall pooled odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval were 1.20 and 0.73 to 1.97 (P = 0.48). When separated by drug administered across all plastic surgery procedures, there were no statistically significant differences in incidences of hematoma or increased bleeding with use of ketorolac (OR, 1.48 [0.86–2.56]; P = 0.57), ibuprofen (OR, 0.55 [0.14–2.14]; P = 0.87), or celecoxib (OR, 0.22 [0.02–2.52]; P = 0.39). When examining NSAID use in breast surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in incidence of hematoma or increased bleeding when combining all 3 drug types (OR, 1.39 [0.82–2.37]; P = 0.60). Some individual studies demonstrated trends toward increased bleeding/hematoma in reduction mammoplasties. Conclusions Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs significantly improve pain control and decrease opioid use when used in plastic surgery. The majority of evidence in plastic surgery does not support an increased incidence of bleeding/hematoma with the use of perioperative NSAIDs.

BackgroundBuilding social networks for health promotion in high-poverty areas may reduce health disparities. Community involvement provides a mechanism to reach at-risk people with culturally tailored health information. Shout-out Health was a feasibility project to provide opportunity and support for women at risk for or living with human immunodeficiency virus infection to carry out health promotion within their informal social networks.Community ContextThe Shout-out Health project was designed by an academic–community agency team. During 3 months, health promotion topics were chosen, developed, and delivered to community members within informal social networks by participants living in Paterson and Jersey City, New Jersey.MethodsWe recruited women from our community agency partner’s clients; 57 women participated in in-person or online meetings facilitated by our team. The participants identified and developed the health topics, and we discussed each topic and checked it for message accuracy before the participants provided health promotion within their informal social networks. The primary outcome for evaluating feasibility included the women’s feedback about their experiences and the number of times they provided health promotion in the community. Other data collection included participant questionnaires and community-recipient evaluations.OutcomeMore than half of the participants reported substantial life challenges, such as unemployment and housing problems, yet with technical support and a modest stipend, women in both groups successfully provided health promotion to 5,861 people within their informal social networks.InterpretationShout-out Health was feasible and has implications for building social networks to disseminate health information and reduce health disparities in communities.

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted many areas of health care and had a significant impact on care delivery, including breast cancer. Methods To better understand the changes to detection and treatment of breast cancer at our institution, we analyzed mammogram rates (screening and diagnostic) and breast cancer operations in 2019-2020. Mammography rates were calculated using county level census data for eligible women (Z-test). For breast cancer staging, a stage severity score was analyzed with a Mann-Whitney U-test (two-tail, P < .05) with proportions derived from WFBH operative volume quarterly reports. Results: Data revealed a relative decline from 2019 to 2020 in breast cancer screening. Screening mammograms decreased by 44% or 1558 fewer screening mammograms (Z = 4.75, P < .00001) and by 21% or 771 fewer for diagnostic mammograms (Z = 2.16, P = .03). With regards to breast cancer operations, we did not identify a statistically significant difference in number of new breast cancer operations at WFBH with 340 cases in 2020 as compared to 384 cases in 2019 ( P = .9905). We compared a breast cancer severity score (weighted by stage at time of operation), which did not reveal statistically significant difference in clinical stage of breast cancer at time of operation ( P = .71, U = 28). Conclusion Mammography was impacted more than breast surgery cases by the COVID-19 pandemic. More data needs to be collected to evaluate future morbidity and mortality related to breast cancer operations and persistent disparities related to delay in breast cancer care due to COVID-19.

Restoration of form and function requires apposition of tissues in the form of flaps to reconstitute local perfusion. Successful reconstruction relies on flap survival and its integration with the recipient bed. The flap's precariously perfused hypoxic areas undergo adaptive microvascular changes both internally and in connection with the recipient bed. A cell-mediated, coordinated response to hypoxia drives these adaptive processes, restoring a tissue's normoxic homeostasis via de novo vasculogenesis,