The domestication syndrome refers to a suite of traits characteristic of domesticated animals, including neotenic aspects of morphology and behavior, increased docility, and reduced reactive aggression. The term self-domestication refers to a process governed by social selection against reactive aggression within species, with effects parallel to those of selection for tameness. There are several recent hypotheses concerning the mechanisms of human self-domestication. It has also recently been hypothesized that bonobos have undergone a process of self-domestication after diverging from their common ancestor with chimpanzees. Here we investigate independent patterns of selection on bonobos (relative to chimpanzees) and humans (relative to Neanderthals) in genes associated with domestication in previous research. We used the Great Apes selection browser and the Neanderthal-human selection browser (in the UCSC Genome Browser) to compare concordant patterns of selection (at the level of gene region and peak selection regions), in a set of 9 genes, to 50 genes found to be under positive selection in bonobos in a prior survey. In terms of concordance, we found that the vasopressin receptor, avpr1b, was ranked first in the peak region and second in the gene region, the oxytocin receptor, oxtr, was ranked second in peak region and sixth in gene region, the serotonin receptor, htr1f, was ranked third in gene region, and the gtf2i gene was found to be ranked ninth for peak region. We argue that our results provide preliminary molecular evolutionary support for parallel patterns of positive selection on genes associated with self-domestication in bonobos and humans.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.