In cases of suspected extrapulmonary tuberculosis, rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis is of prime importance, since traditional techniques of detecting acid-fast bacilli have limitations. The major difficulty with mycobacteria is achieving optimal cell lysis. Buffers used in commercial kits do not allow this complete lysis in a number of clinical specimens. A comparison of two sample preparation methods, pretreatment with proteinase K (PK-Roche) and complete DNA purification (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide [CTAB]-Roche), was conducted on 144 extrapulmonary specimens collected from 120 patients to evaluate the impact on the CobasAmplicor method. Thirty patients were diagnosed with tuberculosis, with 15 patients culture positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Amplification and detection of the amplicons were impaired by a high number of inhibitory specimens (39 to 52%). CTAB-Roche allowed the detection of more culture-positive specimens by PCR than PK-Roche. Comparison with the final diagnoses of tuberculosis confirmed that CTAB-Roche produced the best sensitivity (53.8%) compared to culture (43.3%), PK-Roche (16%), and smear (13%). However, the specificity of the PCR assay with CTAB-Roche-extracted material was always lower (78.8%) than those with culture (100%) and PK-Roche (96.5%). False-positive specimens were lung biopsy material, lymph node biopsy material and aspirate, or bone marrow aspirate, mainly from immunocompromised patients. Despite the efficiency of complete DNA extraction for the rapid diagnosis by PCR of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, the false-positive results challenge our understanding of PCR results.

The introduction of nucleic acid amplification assays into the clinical laboratory has reduced the time needed to diagnose diseases caused by members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). However, several mycobacterial species other than those of the MTBC are known to cause disease, especially in immunocompromised individuals. A screening assay has been developed for the detection of the major pathogenic mycobacterial species. The assay utilizes pan-genus primers to amplify mycobacterial DNA and a screening probe (KY493) that detects all major pathogenic mycobacteria. A multicenter European study was conducted to assess the performance of the screening probe in the clinical laboratory. The screening probe was evaluated against individual probes specific for M. tuberculosis, M. avium, and M. intracellulare, a genus-specific probe with broader species coverage, and culture. The screening probe had a sensitivity equivalent to that of the species-specific probes; all specimens positive with any of the species-specific probes were also positive with the screening probes. Compared to culture, the sensitivity of the screening probe was 89% (154 of 173) for all culture-positive specimens tested. This value was 89.6% for the genus-specific probe. The screening probe was more specific than the genus-specific probe. Specificity was 93.9% (661 of 704) compared to culture results alone. The comparable specificity value for the genus-specific probe was 84.8%. When clinical data were taken into consideration, the sensitivity of the screening assay was similar to that of culture (81% versus 76.2%) but the positive predictive value of the test was lower (76.2% versus 100% for culture). However, the screening probe was more sensitive than smear and may be a useful tool in the rapid diagnosis of mycobacterial disease.Several species of mycobacteria, such as members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and M. leprae, are major human pathogens. Other mycobacterial species, such as M. avium and M. intracellulare, may be clinically significant, especially in immunocompromised individuals. The microscopic examination of specimen smears for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) is a rapid method of screening for the presence of mycobacteria in clinical samples. However, its sensitivity is usually low (1), and culture is required for species identification. Nucleic acid amplification techniques such as PCR coupled with hybridization to a genus-specific probe (5) provide a sensitive screening method that can detect the presence of mycobacterial DNA sooner than culture (2). However, mycobacteria are ubiquitous organisms that can be found in soil and the water supply. The presence of these environmental mycobacteria can give rise to false-positive results with a genus-specific probe. To circumvent this problem, a screening assay that detects all of the major pathogenic mycobacteria but not most environmental mycobacteria has been developed. In this assay, mycobacterial DNA are amplified by PCR with pan-genus primers (6). Amplification pr...