Many western manuscripts were written using iron gall inks. These inks can damage the paper via two major mechanisms: (a) acid hydrolysis, enhanced by humidity, and (b) oxidative depolymerization provoked by the presence of oxygen and free iron(II) ions. The degradation of unsized Whatman paper impregnated with different combinations of iron sulfate, gallic acid, and gum arabic was studied at room temperature in order to assess the relative importance of each mechanism. The samples were stored in various environments including a dry and/or an oxygen-free atmosphere. The cellulose depolymerization was monitored by viscometry and related to changes in the oxidation state of iron, determined by X-ray absorption near-edge spectrometry. The results indicate that residual amounts of oxygen (less than 0.1%) promote cellulose depolymerization, whereas the level of relative humidity has no impact. The cellulose depolymerization also appears closely correlated to oxidative mechanisms. Regarding the oxidation of iron, it only occurs in the simultaneous presence of oxygen and moisture, suggesting the occurrence of rustlike oxidative mechanisms. Finally, the presence of gallic acid has a strong influence, which is only partially explained by its capacity to reduce iron(III) to iron(II).

Fossil materials that contain iron sulfide are well known for their instability when exposed to oxygen and humidity. This term however combines a great variety of materials showing different types of damages. Most of them consist of crystal efflorescence appearing on the surface and inside the matrix. In this work, a methodology was determined for the analysis of these damages by the use of Raman and infrared spectroscopy. The infrared and Raman signatures of a large set of iron sulfates were characterized. Specific attention was paid to sideronatrite and ferrinatrite, which are two associated sodium/iron(III) sulfates, and their infrared and Raman bands were partially assigned. Analysis performed on a selection of 11 damaged fossils showed a great variety of degradation products: besides one case that appeared to be a synthetic resin close to polyvinylchloride acetate, which was applied with a brush on the fossil surface, all degradation products belong to the sulfate group. However, many iron‐free sulfates, such as gypsum, halotrichite, epsomite, or pentahydrite were found, often in association with iron sulfates. In one case, despite the presence of iron in the matrix, no iron sulfate could be detected. This shows that the term ‘pyritic fossil’, commonly used by collection managers, is not appropriate as it oversimplifies the reality. A name such as ‘sulfide‐containing fossil’ would be more suitable. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

International audienceIron gall inks have largely been used for writing in European western countries from the Middle Ages to the twentieth century. Yet, their use may significantly damage the paper through acid hydrolysis and iron catalysed oxidation. These phenomena are not only governed by the chemistry of the ink + cellulose system, but also by the penetration of the ink within the paper sheet. Here, we investigate ink penetration at the scale of a paper fibre using synchrotron-based STXM. This technique allows in situ mapping of the iron redox state and carbon speciation down to the sub-micrometre scale. Linen fibres have been impregnated by iron sulphate, gallic acid and gum Arabic; i.e. the three main ingredients of iron gall inks. Soft X-ray transparent ultrathin foils of impregnated fibres have been extracted using FIB milling. The data reported here evidence that ink components do not penetrate through the paper fibres the same way. In the absence of gum Arabic, gallic acid penetrates within the fibre but mostly remains in the outer part of the cell wall. A significant precipitation of Fe(III) gallate occurs during this migration whereas small amounts of iron (mostly Fe(II)) penetrate through the inner part of the fibre. The addition of gum Arabic as a binder makes the ink more viscous and significantly jeopardizes its ability to penetrate the fibre. The ink thus remains at the surface of the fibre. Low amounts of iron, essentially Fe(II), do still penetrate the fibre

No abstract